SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Growth stocks with Value -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: zx who wrote (1811)10/20/2007 6:36:52 PM
From: zx  Respond to of 3145
 
Distressed Properties

Call them grave dancers, vulture funds, turnaround specialists or the more euphemistic "opportunity investors." However you identify them, the deal is the same: When hyperactive real estate markets lose their sizzle, or property owners no longer can afford to hang on to their houses, well-capitalized investors smell blood and move in.

That's happening in most of the "bubble" areas of the country that saw heavy speculative activity and razzle-dazzle financing from 2001 through 2005. But it's also happening in less volatile markets where unaffordable mortgages and economic distress are producing record numbers of panic sales to investors at fractions of former values.

In Miami Beach and elsewhere in South Florida, for example, real estate consultant Jack McCabe said he is advising "hedge funds, high-net-worth individuals, Wall Street investment banks, and groups of doctors and lawyers" who all want a piece of the area's tottering condominium and townhouse sector, where some properties are selling for 50 cents on the dollar.

McCabe, chief executive of McCabe Research and Consulting in Deerfield Beach, Fla., said investment groups with capital "in the multiple billions" are already active in South Florida, searching for fire-sale prices on properties with good long-term prospects. In the greater Miami area, McCabe estimates, there are 25,000 unsold condos and townhouses on multiple listing services, which he calculates is a 35-month supply at current absorption rates. Another 22,600 units are under construction, and 4,000 more are to begin construction in the next year or two.

At one recent auction, McCabe said, investors walked away with three-bedroom condos for $300,000 that originally sold for $550,000 to $675,000. Though not all units are selling at giveaway prices, he says, Miami is an example for overbuilt, overpriced condo markets that were dominated by speculators during the boom, many of whom have simply sent back the keys and left.

McCabe declined to identify any of his roster of vulture-fund clients, "who prefer to fly under the radar." But they are out in droves to acquire entire buildings -- or floors or individual units -- then refurbish them, convert them to different uses, rent them, out or hold them and resell at the first sign that the local market is bouncing back. McCabe said that for many of these units, this might not happen until 2010 or 2011.

McCabe's segment of the market tends toward big bucks, but around the country, there are hundreds of smaller-scale investors on the prowl for turnaround situations in otherwise stable markets. The largest organization of such entrepreneurs is HomeVestors, a Dallas franchiser started in the mid-1990s. Its more than 260 franchisee partners are on track to buy more than 7,100 individual houses in 35 states this year at value discounts averaging 35 percent to 45 percent, said John Hayes, president and chief executive.

Best known for its advertising slogan "We Buy Ugly Houses," HomeVestors trains its franchisees to spot and capitalize not only on houses that need work, but also on what Hayes calls "ugly situations" -- people with problems who are motivated to sell for cash. Among the most common situations: divorce, death, job loss, problem tenants and mortgage delinquencies caused by unaffordable financing.

HomeVestor franchisees pay a $49,000 fee upfront and must have net assets of $200,000 in cash or cash equivalents. They also pay the parent company $775 for every house they acquire, plus interest on credit lines the company extends to enable them to buy multiple properties. Some HomeVestor franchisees buy, fix, rent or resell 100 or more houses a year, thanks in part to high volumes of potential sellers -- more than 200,000 this year, Hayes said -- who are driven to them by the company's advertising campaigns.

Subprime mortgage delinquencies and foreclosures are swelling those numbers significantly, he said, along with plunging prices in some local areas. Softening markets also are driving down the expected discounts on troubled houses. Whereas in past years, "we might offer 65 percent of a property's expected value after repair, now in some places we're looking at 50 percent," Hayes said.

A $100,000 starter home with a seriously delinquent mortgage and in need of renovation, for instance, might draw an offer of $50,000 to $55,000 cash from a HomeVestor franchisee.

"The owner might be offended at the low-ball offer, but then again, in some situations that might be the only offer they get," Hayes said.



To: zx who wrote (1811)11/10/2007 3:06:22 PM
From: zx  Respond to of 3145
 
The list of middle-class financial problems awaiting solution is lengthy:

* How do we pay for boomers' retirements without busting the economy?

* How do we compensate workers who wind up permanently unemployable because of the global economy?

* How do we finance decent end-of-life care for the chronically ill?

* How do we finance college and graduate school without loading grads with hundreds of thousands in loans?

I think Wall Street could make a killing inventing and selling products that solved those problems.

Of course, after the subprime-mortgage, collateralized-debt, credit-ratings disaster now in progress, Wall Street does have one additional hurdle to jump with many middle-class investors: Do we have enough trust in any product that these guys invent to put real money into it?
-----------------------------------------
Sell Luxottica (LUX, news, msgs).

The stock market just doesn't like consumer stocks with exposure to the slowing U.S. economy -- even if, like Luxottica, the company has a huge future in China. The stock has been under heavy pressure since mid-October and recently broke through support at the 50-day and 200-day moving averages.

I continue to like the stock long term -- who wouldn't like the biggest retailer of sunglasses in China? -- but I expect the downward pressure from the company's U.S. businesses, such as LensCrafters and Sunglass Hut, to keep the stock moving lower. As of Nov. 9, I'm selling these shares with a 6% gain since adding them to Jubak's Picks on Nov. 14, 2006. (Full disclosure: I will sell my personal position in Luxottica three days after this column is posted.)

Buy Rayonier (RYN, news, msgs).

I didn't like the Federal Reserve's Oct. 31 decision to cut interest rates again -- I think it's inflationary and sends the wrong message to risk takers in the financial markets -- but as an investor I try to take what the markets give me. So if interest rates are headed down, I'm going to add high-dividend stocks because falling rates at the Fed will push up the price of these stocks.

Oddly enough, one of the best-performing stocks in my portfolio of Dividend Stocks for Income Investors has been Rayonier. I say it's odd because a good part of the company's business is selling excess land from its timber holdings, and you'd figure that wouldn't be a business to be in during a housing slump. But the price of raw rural land has been holding up remarkably well.

In the just-completed third quarter, Rayonier sold 3,100 acres in west-central Florida for $15,000 an acre. That, plus stronger-than-expected revenue from its performance-fibers business, offset weakness in timber sales due to an intense drought in the South. The company beat Wall Street's earnings estimates of 86 cents a share by 4 cents. Revenue climbed 7% from the third quarter of 2006. As of Nov. 9, I'm adding these shares to Jubak's Picks with a target price of $55 a share by November 2008. (Full disclosure: I will add shares of Rayonier to my personal portfolio three days after this column is posted.)
Developments on past columns
"Profit when oil's have-nots crash": On Oct. 26, in a previous update to this column, I wrote, "Like a lot of other oil companies this quarter, it's likely that Devon Energy (DVN, news, msgs) will show a decline in earnings from the third quarter of 2006, when it reports before the market opens on Nov. 7. I'd urge investors to look past any quarterly disappointment." Some disappointment! The company did indeed show a drop in earnings of 9 cents a share, or about 5%, from the third quarter of 2006, but Devon blew away projections by posting earnings of $1.57 a share -- 17 cents above the Wall Street consensus. Revenue rose 10.6% from the third quarter of 2006.

The company reported that it expected production to exceed its 2007 targets but that it would not increase guidance for 2008 production until the company's board met to sign off on 2008 capital spending. But as giddy as the quarterly numbers may make you feel, remember this: The reason to own Devon is the company's long-term potential.

This is one of the few Western oil companies that isn't facing troubling questions about how to reinvest profits. Devon is one of the top five leaseholders in the deep waters of the Gulf of Mexico. Last year, the company announced the first successful production test at these greater depths (with production in 2010 or so, if everything goes well).

Devon is also the largest leaseholder in the Barnett Shale natural-gas fields in Texas, where gas production rose 32% year over year in the third quarter. The company also owns a 100% working interest in Jackfish, a project in Alberta's oil sands, and in smaller projects in Brazil and Azerbaijan that are scheduled to go into production this year. As of Nov 9, I'm raising my price target to $102 a share by December 2007. (Full disclosure: I own shares of Devon in my personal portfolio.)

"10 stocks for 2007 and beyond": Tejon Ranch (TRC, news, msgs) reported third-quarter earnings of 35 cents a share, up from 4 cents a share in the third quarter of 2006. Revenue from operations climbed by 17% to just shy of $11 million. But I don't think that will move up the stock's price -- not with everybody afraid to touch real-estate stocks.

Maybe I should have called these picks "10 stocks for 2007 and way beyond." After hitting a high of $56.12 -- about $2 a share above my purchase price -- on Dec. 27, 2006, shares of Tejon have moved steadily in one direction: down. There's no secret about why: The troubles in the subprime-mortgage market have raised fears of a broader decline in the real-estate market. And Tejon's major asset is land: the 270,000 acres the company owns just 60 miles north of Los Angeles along Interstate 5.

Still, I think sellers are overreacting. Permitting on the two residential communities the company is developing in Southern California -- Centennial, 12,000 acres in Los Angeles County; and Tejon Mountain Village, 28,000 acres in Kern County -- is still a long way off, especially now that environmentalists have raised new opposition to development based on potential harm to the California condor.

Higher taxes from mortgage mess
Why not laugh while Wall Street burns? Because the debt crisis has spread to companies that insure bonds issued by cities and states, says MSN Money's Jim Jubak. And that means local governments could raise taxes to pay for a hit to their credit ratings.

Land prices are likely to have recovered by the time the company gets around to selling anything. In the meantime, the sell-off of the past year has lowered the price that investors in the stock pay for a developable acre of land from $7,000 to about $4,800. Think that land only 60 miles outside Los Angeles and smack-dab along I-5 might be worth a bit more than that per acre? At that price, investors should come out on the plus side even if the company has to put more land aside for conservation. So hang in there. This one will pay off in the long run.

As of Nov. 9, however, I'm extending my target price timetable to $52 a share by October 2008 from my prior schedule of October 2007. (Full disclosure: I own shares of Tejon Ranch in my personal portfolio.)