Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : THE WHITE HOUSE -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John Carragher who wrote (6861)	8/3/2007 12:42:03 PM
From: pompsander	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 25737

Following your logic, why not invade Saudi Arabia? They have funded terrorism far more than Iraq did under Saddam, and they had 9 of hte 9/11 hijackers. They have more oil and they are NOT our friends (despite Mr. Bush's seeming unawareness of this fact.) If you want to stabilize the region and ensure oil supplies, and take on a regime that has sent millions to our terrorist enemies, and the home of Osama.... So, why Iraq? WMD??? Or the fact they invaded Iran in 19882 Kuwait in 1989? Gee, they were no danger of invading anybody in 2002.