SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (104464)8/3/2007 2:36:57 PM
From: DizzyG  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 173976
 
Oh, that's great. So public safety is now a polling issue?

Come on Kenneth, give your polls a rest. Fact is, your Democrat Governor and Legislature have known about these bridges since 2005 and have done NOTHING. This is nothing more then political CYA.

Diz-



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (104464)8/4/2007 10:05:28 PM
From: JBTFD  Respond to of 173976
 
On the Viaduct I think the questions are incomplete. People's answers would vary a lot depending on what they were replacing the viaduct with.

I'm against a tunnel personally. It's just a land grab for the big money. But I would be for taxes to strengthen the viaduct as it is.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News