SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: muzosi who wrote (238195)8/5/2007 11:57:14 PM
From: dougSF30Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Yeah, it isn't just a shrink, despite what Petz claimed, but the "tweaks" sure worked out nicely.



To: muzosi who wrote (238195)8/6/2007 12:38:11 AM
From: wbmwRespond to of 275872
 
Re: i thought the sse4 instructions were new to penryn? which 65nm family has them? or the 6m cache? with so many known differences and who knows how many ipc enhancements how can you claim penryn to be a shrink?

It's 45nm, so it's obviously a shrink. It just happens to be a shrink with the greatest number of IPC enhancements to happen to an Intel shrink, which was my point.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News