SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Peter Dierks who wrote (61801)8/8/2007 11:44:25 AM
From: MrLucky  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 90947
 
Hillary has quite a machine. It will be difficult for an unknown glamour boy or glamour girl to burst on the scene this cycle.

Hmmm. A woman versus a man as President. Does that mean her salary would be lower. ;-)



To: Peter Dierks who wrote (61801)8/8/2007 5:00:53 PM
From: KLP  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 90947
 
We could have a woman President. BUT not Hillary. If we trust her, it's at our peril. Plus the others in the campaign on her side, are even worse....

I wish another Jeanne Kirkpatrick would come on the scene! I'd vote for someone like her today in a heartbeat!



To: Peter Dierks who wrote (61801)8/8/2007 9:41:48 PM
From: Sully-  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 90947
 
Looking Good By Comparison

Power Line

Hillary Clinton, long a bete noir of the right, has morphed into--relatively speaking--a voice of responsibility in the Democratic Party. Ryskind comments:



Personally, I'd like to elect a President about whom one could say something better than he's not as bad as John Edwards.

powerlineblog.com

web.mac.com