Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (15612)	8/9/2007 10:48:39 PM
From: neolib	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36917

Your are absolutely correct. However, the real question to me is are you making survival of the fittest neutral to humans? Hunting certainly does not, i.e. we are selecting for survival against humans. We are only one species, and until modern times, most animal evolution was driven by the ecosystem as a whole, not the actions of a single species. So I would think that birth control methods could certainly be implemented at least as well as hunting is. How much better you can do would depend on many assumptions and no doubt some of that highly maligned science endevour of modelling.