Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: neolib who wrote (15640)	8/10/2007 4:39:00 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 36917

"I wound not agree with that." Would you mind venturing an example of a situation where humans established themselves but did not dominate?

To: neolib who wrote (15640)	8/11/2007 2:24:38 PM
From: mistermj	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36917

Hunting has a long history of taking the best trophies, not the worst. Kind of brain dead. I think you are distorting this. There may very well be a subset of hunting that is only interested in trophies...but a "trophy" is a relative and subjective thing to each individual hunter. For some, successfully hunting a certain animal is the "trophy" aspect of the hunt and they are in fact culling the weakest and not just interested in the largest animal or trophy horns...so to speak. More on point, the vast majority of hunting is still for meat and the sport of it.(In this country anyway). This still involves culling the weakest, or the animals least able to escape hunters by definition.