Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Classic TA Workplace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rcksinc who wrote (147917)	8/13/2007 4:19:12 PM
From: The Freep	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 209892

I'm not Henry, but I know what he'll say -- a H+S cannot form on a low. An inverse one can, but a H+S is by definition a topping pattern. Now, maybe he'll note the late day pierce of the uptrendline off the low... or that in the wiggles there, the move off the low has overlap (unless we're about to launch the iii of 3 up, of course). But he's not gonna agree on the need for more right shoulder action, imo! And I'd concur all around, btw.... (P.S. MC -- how'd I do? :-)

To: rcksinc who wrote (147917)	8/13/2007 4:39:21 PM
From: Henry J Costanzo	Respond to of 209892

I believe in them, steve..when they appear where they should...Right here, we'd have to be talking H&S bottom....But hard for me to see a H&S bottom in that chart..vbg...Where are you putting the neckline ??