SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Snowshoe who wrote (215571)8/13/2007 5:52:41 PM
From: KLP  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793996
 
Here's more to the "firecrackers" story:

- Plausible, Or Plausible Deni-ability?
Update: The latest:

TAMPA - A gas tank for a lawn mower, a telephone, computer and some pipe.

Noor Salhab said those were some of the items seized Saturday during an FBI search of his Temple Terrace rental property.

Update: Okay, now this just looks like a lie:

"No, I've actually never seen him (Mohamed) before,” said the son. “I saw his picture on the air, and I recognize the other individual, I've seen him here, but the other one I've never seen."

And just a week ago, linked below:

Ishtay and Salhab said that sometimes when Mohamed and Megahed visited their house in Temple Terrace they would cook, but neither knew them well.

Some of the items the Feds took from the home:

Family spokesman Ahmed Bedier says the FBI did take a suitcase that belonged to Mohamed-- but also grabbed other items that weren't his.

“They seized the gas can they said was used for the lawn mower. They took some PVC pipes they said were used to repair the sprinkler system to the house,” he said the homeowner told him.

“You know, some silly stuff. Some soap and stuff like that," added the homeowner.

Update: Seems even more surprising if a Noor (Nour) Salhab wouldn't recall the Al-Arian search. He's listed as a witness during the trial on page 8 of the government witness list.

Some additional statements have been made in the investigation into the Goose Creek incident, including on items possibly in the boys trunk, and it's starting to look as though Ahmed Mohamed, recently here from Egypt, is being cast as the odd man out in all of this. However, some of the alleged denials are a little tough to accept.

First up, Noor Salhab, owner of the recently searched house, says he doesn't know anything about a previous raid on his property during the Al-Arian investigation as he wasn't living there at the time, though he apparently did own it. But we also know he rents the house he does live in from one of Al-Arian's co-defendants. He's also a Realtor, claiming to now want to sell the house. Seems funny he wouldn't know about that previous raid.

Salhab says they don’t know anything about previous raids on the house because they haven’t lived in the house for several years.

Meanwhile, his son who lives in the house now claims he doesn't know Ahmed Mohamed.

One was Salhab's son, who says he didn't know Ahmed Mohamed, one the arrested USF students.

Salhab confirmed that the other tenant did know Mohamed, and allowed him to store his belongings there, without Salhab's knowledge or approval.

From an earlier story, define "know him," I guess - see below. And Salhab's roommate knew him well enough to get cited with him for shooting squirrels in a park. Meanwhile, all these associations appear to be linked through an as yet unidentified man from Mauritania who "recently" moved here from Canada and evidently just decided to move back to Canada the day after the arrests.

Ishtay, who rents a Temple Terrace house and works at Boston Market, said he met Mohamed and Megahed through a roommate. He said he didn't know the roommate's last name, but he was from Mauritania.

Another of Ishtay's roommates, Ghassan Salhab, 27, said the man from Mauritania moved here from Canada recently and returned there Monday.

Ishtay and Salhab said that sometimes when Mohamed and Megahed visited their house in Temple Terrace they would cook, but neither knew them well.

Now for the items in the trunk. Keep in mind, we are talking about college engineering students, one at the Graduate level, with some claim of interest in amateur rocketry. You'd think someone with that background might be a little wary of carrying several combustible chemicals, including gasoline and lighter fluid in the trunk with compressed oxygen and materials for making fireworks while driving through South Carolina on a hot July day. Previous posts here.

He said his son often kept in the trunk a gas canister, for refueling, along with charcoal, a small barbecue grill and lighter fluid, for cookouts. He liked to grill chicken and beef with friends, the father said.

Lately, Youssef has been working on a broken-down Lexus, so he likely kept in the trunk tools and chemicals to clean the tools, because the family has no garage, Samir Megahed said. Youssef also enjoyed scuba diving and may have had gear in the car, he said.

TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
typepad.com



To: Snowshoe who wrote (215571)8/13/2007 6:16:51 PM
From: goldworldnet  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793996
 
Congress enacted the Safe Explosives Act (SEA) on November 25, 2002. Sections 1121-1123 of SEA amended section 842(i) of Title 18 of the U.S. Code by adding several categories to the list of persons who may not lawfully ``ship or transport any explosive in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce'' or ``receive or possess any explosive which has been shipped or transported in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce.'' Prior to the amendment, 18 U.S.C. 842(i) prohibited the transportation of explosives by any person under indictment for or convicted of a felony, a fugitive from justice, an unlawful user or addict of any controlled substance, and any person who had been adjudicated as a mental defective or committed to a mental institution. The amendment added three new categories to the list of prohibited persons: Aliens (with certain limited exceptions), persons dishonorably discharged from the armed forces, and former U.S. citizens who have renounced their citizenship. Persons who violate 18 U.S.C. 842(i) are subject to criminal penalties.

epa.gov

* * *