Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Stan who wrote (67641)	8/15/2007 9:57:13 AM
From: engineer	Respond to of 197623

or they can rule that each class of chips must be a lawsuit and not a single biased class. This would allow work arounds to be brought to market and a complete blanket injunction would be equally detrimental in the other direction.

To: Stan who wrote (67641)	8/15/2007 9:14:32 PM
From: carranza2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 197623

Got on PACER to see whether there are any tea leaves worth reading in the BRCM vs Q case pending in Santa Ana in which the injunction remedy is being considered. None. Zero, zilch, nada. Everything but everything worth reading is sealed and therefore unavailable. Impossible to say anything about that case. Sorry. What a statement by IMJ, huh? Q not working on alternatives and that he knew nothing about the case. One of the reasons I got out of Q [biggest being dead money] is the fact that the litigation ineptitude could have signalled management ineptitude. It's looking inceasingly possible that Q's management team is inexperienced at best and incompetent at worst.