To: Steve Dietrich who wrote (105306 ) 8/15/2007 5:06:59 PM From: one_less Respond to of 173976 "Why not throw in the murder of Vince Foster while you're at it? That's funny, I love what you do. Its so precarious and easy to expose. Lovely hysterics dude but poor dodge, oh gosh, that one got me giggling mr not defending clinton. Let's see why not Vince Foster? hhhhhm could it be that vince did not accuse clinton of murdering him, that vince is not a woman, that vince was not claiming to be a vulnerable victim of sex abuse, that no eye witnesses made any such allegation and that there was no corroboration ... Do YOU see any problem with vince being on that other list?'That's a list of unsubstantiated allegations, not a list of bad deeds. You are mistaken the allegations are substantiated starting with the one by Hillary, that's the criteria for most of them making the list. Maybe you meant they aren't charged, convicted, and sentenced in a court of law Mr legal expert. There have been many comments by Bill and Hill refering to his indescretions and deeds that have caused marital problems for them. This list has very credible reports which in many cases have corroboration but I haven't accused bill, I only posted a list of complaints from women who were largely part of his inner or intimate circle at one time or another, including hillary. Your hysterical reaction is very telling. You also lack honor and dignity as a poster here. I assure you your opinion is meaningless on this score. But maybe your highly honorable buds will rec your post. lol C'mon guys: SeachRE, Orcastraitor, Kenneth, JF, Chris, Kant, Sylvester80, AS, Parsons, some of the rest of you, the guy is working his butt off for you. Well I have no legal proof he is a guy, so you can call that a fraudulent allegation if you like. I will give him one rec, who else is in.