Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: wbmw who wrote (238927)	8/16/2007 2:41:35 PM
From: combjelly	Respond to of 275872

"Ditto, Combjelly." What is dishonest in my arguments? I have given reasons for my viewpoints, not just handwaving and buzz words. "either because you are lazy or uneducated on the subject" Again with the insults. You started with the insults as soon as I questioned your assertions, instead of backing them up with anything but an appeal to authority. Then you pretend you are all innocent. That is what I mean by dishonest.

To: wbmw who wrote (238927)	8/16/2007 3:04:54 PM
From: TGPTNDR	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

wb, Re: I've tried numerous times to explain myself, and still you resort to insults as a response. It just goes to show that when you have no means to debate the argument, either because you are lazy or uneducated on the subject, the best way you know to defuse it is to attack the poster by calling them dishonest.> If I was in CJs shoes you'd be out of here for that statement. Even if you laid on doug, petz, or SYH, as examples. For folks who're interested the post WB was responding to is: Message 23800187 Seems to me CJ has the stronger argument and WB is trying to Weasel Word out. But that's only an opinion, -tgp