Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : SONS -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: phatbstrd who wrote (1167)	8/17/2007 11:24:52 AM
From: carranza2	Respond to of 1575

Ya know C2, you absolutely blast Q for its management, but this group takes the case with shareholder deception. I don't understand what you're trying to say. I have indeed blasted management for its handling of strategy and legal matters. I think that Lupin's departure may bring about some positive events. I think the most deceptive stuff was issued by Lupin. And he was not reined in, as far as I know, and that is an upper management problem, probably PJ's mollycoddling of a buddy and inexperience in these kinds of things. His departure is very positive, IMO. I think IMJ has tightened the leash on PJ. All of this bodes well, and I may get back in once the BRCM suits do the perfectly predictable damage to the share price. You will pardon me for wanting the best price possible, won't you? vbg I just now realized that I was talking about Q in the SONS thread. OK, you're right. Management is very opaque, not necessarily crooked, but opaque. The accounting methods and the recognition of revenue rules don't help.