Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (347343)	8/17/2007 7:32:50 PM
From: longnshort	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572787

yeah 92% is not high enough for you lolol, what a anal bozo you are. go walk though one of those wonderful places at night.

To: combjelly who wrote (347343)	8/17/2007 11:55:21 PM
From: Joe NYC	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572787

combjelly, Which you claimed were poor and black and hence democratic. But, it is easy to prove that all inner cities are not all poor and black, despite voting democratic. Depends on how you pick your granularity. If you pick a whole city, there will always be a mix of income groups. But the point was that the bottom of the income distribution are overwhelmingly Democrat. So if you want to (dis)prove the theory, you have to go to a granularity other than entire cities, but something like a zip code or even smaller area, where you will find concentration of low income residents without yuppies being mixed or much of a middle class being mixed in. Joe