SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Rich Bloem who wrote (67880)8/18/2007 8:07:08 AM
From: kyungha  Respond to of 197272
 
I have the same feeling. It just issued 2 months ago after filing in 2-2006. It did not take long. Is effective date 2-2006 of this patent?



To: Rich Bloem who wrote (67880)8/18/2007 10:47:45 AM
From: rkral  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 197272
 
"For instance, the 761 patent was issued 2 months ago. Now common sense would tell you that if Q is actually using this method, it was either obvious or they also have a patent with a different description. One way or another, Q was practising this art many months and perhaps years before this patent was issued."

I don't think that's the right way to look at it.

For patents filed after 6/7/1995 utility patents expire 20 years from the filing date. IOW the "effective date" of the patent is most probably the filing date, not the issue date. Moreover, '761 is a continuation patent whose parent is U.S. Pat No. 7,031,687 with a 4/18/2001 filing date.

"the more one thinks about this IPR hornets nest, you have to realize that something has to be do done at the USPO level.
[...]
There has to be something done to eliminate the never ending lawsuits.
[...]
It is time to get back to the idea that a patent has to be NOVEL. Not simply an obvious additive.
"

No argument there, but equitable agreements by reasonable executives would help a lot too.

"RKAL"

I see that a lot. Must be some hagfish spell that makes the 2nd 'r' invisible. :-)