Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (105560)	8/20/2007 7:16:56 PM
From: SeachRE	Respond to of 173976

Obviously, you don't know LAW. Lying about a defendant in a criminal deposition is a dangerous thing. Otherwise, lying is often regarded as irrelevant nonsense. The jails are full already...

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (105560)	8/20/2007 7:20:10 PM
From: SeachRE	Respond to of 173976

Have you found a Biology dictionary yet, Whiplash boy?

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (105560)	8/20/2007 9:45:54 PM
From: Steve Dietrich	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 173976

Try and pay attention. We're talking about the deposition in the Paula Jones civil case. Your link pertains to Grand Jury testimony. You really don't know much about this stuff, do you? Scooter Libby is the guy who was charged with and convicted of lying before a Grand Jury. Got it? SD

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (105560)	8/20/2007 10:12:07 PM
From: Steve Dietrich	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 173976

Also, if you look at the link you posted it says: "(a) Whoever under oath (or in any declaration, certificate, verification, or statement under penalty of perjury as permitted under section 1746 of title 28, United States Code) in any proceeding before or ancillary to any court or grand jury of the United States knowingly makes any false material declaration or makes or uses any other information, including any book, paper, document, record, recording, or other material, knowing the same to contain any false material declaration, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both." The false testimony has to be material. It says so right there in the law. Judge Wright ruled Clinton's testimony was immaterial. Immaterial = no perjury. If you would ever bother to learn what a Summary Dismissal is you'd see how stupid this line of reasoning your pursuing is. Get over it, you're wrong on this one. SD