SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Brumar89 who wrote (216346)8/20/2007 7:14:56 PM
From: Rambi  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793916
 
So?

WOW

Are you saying you believe it is appropriate for a teacher to say in front of a class that she is assigning a sexually explicit author to one of the students because he (and presumably his parents) are not Christians,and thus they won't object?

If so, then I am speechless, Brumar. Speechless. That was the worst sort of judgmental discrimination. MOrality can be found only in the realm of the Christian belief system and a non-believer is incapable of moral discrimination? It is appropriate to assign something to one student that it seems you would not to another based on his religious affiliation?
Wow.
Please tell me I have misunderstood you.



To: Brumar89 who wrote (216346)8/20/2007 7:19:25 PM
From: Rambi  Respond to of 793916
 
NO, I guess these things aren't big deals to those who aren't affected by them.



To: Brumar89 who wrote (216346)8/20/2007 10:16:15 PM
From: Bridge Player  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793916
 
A high school coach has absolutely no business describing a kid who won a track award as an ideal Christian hard-working boy. Most especially and particularly if there are Muslins and/or non-believers present.

And it is indeed a big deal IMO. It is in fact a gratuitous, insulting comment.