SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: scratchmyback who wrote (68121)8/22/2007 10:00:00 AM
From: JeffreyHF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 197455
 
Scratchy, you have assumed a conclusion that is legally and factually in dispute; i.e. that Nokia hasn't by tender of $20 mil for a purported post-expiration quarterly payment, together with continued use of Qualcomm IPR, exercised the option to renew. As that matter is currently being arbitrated, prudence would suggest that your premise is premature, and somewhat speculative.



To: scratchmyback who wrote (68121)8/23/2007 1:52:06 AM
From: Paul V.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 197455
 
scratchmyback, however, NOK did send a check to Qcom if I remember correctly. Isn't it believeable that Qcom made a copy of said check prior to returning it to NOK. Therefore, doesn't that show intent and past practice on the part of NOK that they are are using Qcom's patent.

Paul