To: Steve Dietrich who wrote (105695 ) 8/22/2007 4:32:47 PM From: one_less Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 173976 The facts: a judge found Clinton guilty of willfully lying in his testimony and clinton admitted it: ... Simply put, the president's deposition … was intentionally false, and his statements … likewise were intentionally false . . . ." Based on that his willful false testimony, JUDGE Susan Webber Wright expressly provided by law that, his license to practice law was suspended in Arkansas and later by the United States Supreme Court and according to law he was also fined $90,000." How can the court system do what they did if Clinton is not found guilty? They can't. Was clinton guilty or not guilty by law in the eyes of the court? He was. Did he admit it. He did? Was it a civil matter? No, it was a criminal matter. Was he impeached on two counts, 1) grand jury perjury and 2) Obstruction of Justice? He was. Do you squirm with a forked tongue in your fraud and dishonor? You do. Fitzgerald, your source of authority, clearly holds false testimony as a crime, superordinate to all other proceedings related to courts, as do I. He doesn't create loopholes for someone under the umbrella of your partisan extremism in his statements, as you attempt to do. Fitzgerald’s words that you referenced:... anyone who would go into a grand jury and lie, obstruct and impede the investigation has committed a serious crime. ...We need to know the truth. And anyone who would go into a grand jury and lie, obstruct and impede the investigation has committed a serious crime. … the truth is the engine of our judicial system. And if you compromise the truth, the whole process is lost. …our jobs, the criminal justice system, is to make sure people tell us the truth. And when it's a high-level official and a very sensitive investigation, it is a very, very serious matter that no one should take lightly. … telling false testimony and obstructing the investigation, that, to me, defines a serious breach of the public trust. Clinton lied in court, and was caught, and admitted it, and was punished for it by the legal system. And there is not a shadow of a doubt about it no matter how much you try defend the indefensible under false premise. <b"I've told you many, many times that Clinton did not commit perjury in the Jones deposition because his testimony was not material." You say lots of squirmy things to expose your fraud and dishonor. So what?