Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (216697)	8/23/2007 2:48:41 AM
From: epicure	Respond to of 793777

Weren't we talking about Mass? The Mass law was changed by the court. I'm ok with that. I do not think the legislature "should have" been involved instead of the courts. Was I supposed to enumerate that? I would have assumed you knew I was ok with courts making rulings- since I was mentioning court rulings that I was ok with. I thought that was implicit. If it wasn't implicit, let me just say- I approve of courts making decisions like this, even when I disagree with them, I think it is their function. When I said don't change the law in the schools, I meant abide by the laws until they are changed- by the legislature, or in the Mass case, by the court- although any change in law by a court involves the legislature because they can, if they want to, rewrite such laws.