Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : THE WHITE HOUSE -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (7794)	8/24/2007 11:00:08 PM
From: Gersh Avery	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25737

OK .. I'm sure he's against it.

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (7794)	8/24/2007 11:14:13 PM
From: Gersh Avery	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25737

"plan regarding terrorists," "his policy on terrorism" Please stop changing the subject of your question. Is the question about the terror people or politics? ist or ism? I think working to keep terrorists out of the USA is a pretty good idea. Being able to stop them at the boarders would be a good thing. That was what I directed you toward. Preventing the US from being the police for the whole earth could go far in preventing terrorism against the US. There are some places that we simply shouldn't be. "there is no way you can convince me to vote for Ron Paul if that's how you handle my question" I hope that <g> is real. I'd hate to think that I could control your vote by being confused. I would like to answer your question .. but, so far, it's simply to vague and seems to change with each post.