Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Spekulatius who wrote (27902)	8/25/2007 8:18:40 AM
From: Madharry	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78731

I see that 6 to 1 ratio bandied about frequently. I wonder if you could elaborate on that. seems to me that lots of other factors go into the pricing. storage capacity, transportability, and gasoline demand for example. one can't move ng nearly as easily as oil. so right there i think that would call for some kind of a premium. Do you like aly as well?

To: Spekulatius who wrote (27902)	8/27/2007 10:36:52 AM
From: Jurgis Bekepuris	Respond to of 78731

BJS is still expensive IMHO. CPX - too short history for me. NBR - too inconsistent results.

To: Spekulatius who wrote (27902)	10/22/2007 11:11:54 AM
From: Paul Senior	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78731

Spekulatius, I'll follow you into oil/gas service company CPX at current price. A few shares to start. finance.yahoo.com