Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (21599)	8/25/2007 10:51:43 AM
From: Crimson Ghost	Respond to of 217886

Country's top decisions are made in secret by the Fed By Chris Powell Journal Inquirer, Manchester, Connecticut Saturday, August 25, 2007 journalinquirer.com. Most of the important public policy decisions in the country now are being made not in any public forum nor even by elected officials. They are being made in secret by unelected officials -- the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. While the governors are nominated by the president and appointed by the Senate, that is pretty much where accountability ends, since the governors serve 14-year terms, which is close to the life tenure of federal judges. There is a little more accountability for the board's chairman and vice chairman, who are nominated by the president from among the board's members and appointed by the Senate for four-year terms of leadership. This structure is said to take politics out of the management of the money supply and interest rates. In practice it has only replaced public politics with private politics -- and in regard to issues that have the greatest bearing on the country's prosperity and economic opportunity and equality or inequality. The president and Congress spend most of their time on issues far less relevant to daily life than the issues that have been forfeited to the Federal Reserve. And look how the Fed is functioning amid the turmoil in the world financial system that has been prompted by the collapse in the market for "subprime" mortgage bonds. As it always does in crisis, the Fed has responded with secret meetings and telephone conferences with the great financial houses, deciding in secret whether to increase the money supply and government lending to financial houses and to raise or reduce interest rates. Such actions by the Fed will change the value of every dollar around the world. They will change the price of labor, goods, services, and real estate, as well as the return on savings. But there will be no public hearings or public meetings at which the basis for the Fed's actions will be examined and those actions explained. It all will be accomplished in secret, with a vague communique issued afterward. And who constitutes the Fed's Board of Governors and the officials of the regional Federal Reserve banks? Mostly people from the financial industry. So it is no wonder that the Fed usually seems to be operating more for the benefit of financial interests than for the country generally -- just as it seemed when, in 1999, Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan persuaded Congress not to require government regulation of the sort of financial instruments, called derivatives, that have upended the markets lately. While derivatives always posed a risk to the financial system and the economy, they also promised great profits to financial houses. In any case, however the Fed's power is used, it is the power to influence and even rig markets and to decide all winners and losers in the economy. It is the ultimate patronage. And the exercise of that power, the monetary power of the United States -- the power to determine what money is, how much there is, its price, and the terms of its circulation -- is completely undemocratic, which is exactly why it is exercised in secret. For its exercise cannot bear scrutiny. A few participants in the system occasionally have acknowledged as much, as when the Fed's vice chairman, Alan Blinder, remarked on national television in 1994: "The last duty of a central banker is to tell the public the truth." Some of its critics consider the Fed unconstitutional. After all, the Founders opposed central banking, and the Constitution says Congress "shall have the power to coin money, regulate the value thereof, and of foreign coin." But whether Congress can delegate its power over money creation is less important than the Constitution's assertion that the decisions of the monetary power are among the most profound of government. Of course Congress well may not want the political responsibility that comes with the monetary power. The Fed can be a convenient scapegoat for what is really the irresponsibility of the rest of the government. But Wall Street wants the monetary power and does not have to bear any political responsibility for it, and that is the system the United States now has -- a system in which the monetary power has been turned over to what used to be called the Money Power. And this insult to public sovereignty over the most important issues of government is praised as the "independence" of central banking. As the country faces another disaster engineered by the Money Power, it's time for Congress to remake the Federal Reserve System into something democratic, open, and accountable, or to reclaim the monetary power itself. -----

To: TobagoJack who wrote (21599)	8/25/2007 11:30:23 AM
From: elmatador	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217886

Standard & Poor’s: Asian economies would be able to weather the current turmoil in the global equity and credit markets caused by US subprime ELMAT: Nothing like a decoupling sign to bright my Saturday! Global ratings agency, Standard & Poor’s today said Asian economies would be able to weather the current turmoil in the global equity and credit markets caused by US subprime crisis. “The risk of further hedge fund closures or failures is certainly real, and investors and lenders are tentative when the extent of the risks and losses are unclear. Likewise, any significant and prolonged decline in asset and market valuations could also sap confidence. However, while economic activity and confidence remain robust, the Asian economies are likely to get a little wet but will not be blown off course,” S&P said in a research note. Most policymakers in these economies appear to have learnt their lessons from the 1997 Asian financial crisis, and an overview of Asian countries shows few signs of apparent weaknesses.

To: TobagoJack who wrote (21599)	8/25/2007 3:16:44 PM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217886

... ban off/ The instant this happens, I shall dial 0 800 GET ME OUT, then 111 'SAVE ME'. < it's time for Congress to remake the Federal Reserve System into something democratic, open, and accountable, or to reclaim the monetary power itself.> If Helicopter Ben is left in charge, it's possible that financial relativity theory will do as was done in the Biotelecosmictechdot.com bust = accelerate the financial system nearer the speed of light, which shrinks the dollar further, while taking more financial energy to do it. There is a bigger debt with much bigger global financial engines as China has grown 10% a year for another 7 years and everywhere has grown too. [Don't count Zimbabwe]. So there will be a LOT more fun and a lot more fuel poured into the phragmented photon powered financial engines. It's traditional to rob savers and holders of currency units to bail out the politically powerful and greedily indebted. Heck, it's traditional to confiscate everything. See Zimbabwe as an example of what USA electorates are likely to think is a good idea when push comes to shove and their house and SUV are being sold to me for nickels on the dollar. Of course, even though their houses are cheap, I might not want to buy them as swarms of angry, hungry and newly-slender gun-MAD people roaming the dry climate of California looking for food and defending "their" property, could reduce my life expectancy./ban on... That is of course a worst case scenario. Not worst really because they could start a MAD war with Russia and China and even France and vast nuclear annihilation is possible. Nuclear weapons, rockets, ships and submarines have been built with the intention of using them. They were NOT built with fake GPS systems. With luck, there will simply be repricing, redeployment of employees, reduction of borrow, hope and spend and everyone will get back to living happily ever after cerfing cyberspace in their swanky new CDMA-powered phragmented photon cyberphones. Renting or paying a bigger mortgage is much the same. It's just the name on the title which changes. Helicopters have been launched, cash is being tossed into the financial maelstrom. Mqurice