SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro vs Intel (AMD / INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: dougSF30 who wrote (2014)8/26/2007 5:44:09 AM
From: mas_  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2596
 
I didn't forget anything and FB-Dimm latency is no better than what Intel have currently got with the memory controller on the chipset. I had this specifically confirmed with guys who worked on the FB-Dimm specification on RWT. All the FB-Dimm controller on-die buys you is local memory for each chip. You are completely clueless and uninformed as always.



To: dougSF30 who wrote (2014)8/26/2007 6:05:47 AM
From: mas_  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2596
 
Here's some actual FB-Dimm proof as well, 107.5 ns for the Niagara T1 processor which has 4 on-die FB-Dimm Controllers.

anandtech.com

So who's really spouting embarrassing rubbish here ?!


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News