Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro vs Intel (AMD / INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: dougSF30 who wrote (2017)	8/26/2007 1:49:36 PM
From: mas_	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2596

Say it all you want but I have known about FB-Dimm's no latency improvement since 2004 unlike you who can't even believe it now. realworldtech.com >What sort of latency benefit will this give over what they have now and also compared with AMD's approach ? Not all that much, if any. P4 chipsets are already delivering open page latency on the order of ~90ns or so. AMD's open page latency looks to be about 50~60ns or so. About half of that is from the DRAM devices, so you can perhaps squeeze half of the latency out if you went with AMD's "bare iron" CPU->DRAM approach. My WAG is that a CPU to AMB to DRAM config would have idle system latency roughly comparable to what the P4 system deliver now. It may be slightly better, but not by much. You are making false accusations and assumptions about my statements because your knowledge of the industry is so inadequate and surface-deep. It's like arguing with a petulant child who just won't be told.