Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Israel to U.S. : Now Deal with Syria and Iran -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sea_urchin who wrote (16201)	8/28/2007 12:16:14 PM
From: Crimson Ghost	Respond to of 22250

More on pro-Israel agenda of those who want to keep the Iraq war going philipweiss.org August 27, 2007 Only the Jewish Press Calls a Spade a Spade: New Pro-Iraq-War Group Is a Jewish Group With Walt and Mearsheimer's Israel Lobby book about to burst onto the scene, the poverty of the existing debate over the Israel interest in American politics is demonstrated by the coverage of Freedom's Watch, the new rightwing group spending millions on television to urge the Congress to keep American forces in Iraq. Only the Jewish Telegraphic Agency has the guts to say what is obvious, that "Pro-Surge Group Is Almost All Jewish" that four out of five board members of Freedom's Watch are Jewish, and the fifth board member is married to a Jew. I take this point further. A large number of Freedom's Watch's staff or backers have stated that Israel's security is central to their view of the Iraq war. Matthew Brooks, a board member of the group, said two years back to justify this war: You know, as well as I, that Saddam Hussein launched scud missiles at Israel ... You know that Saddam paid a bounty of $25,000 to the families of Palestinian homicide bombers. Brooks is director of a group called the Republican Jewish Coalition, which does not even accept the idea of a Palestinian state. It speaks only of a "Palestinian political entity" under the right circumstances. I think it's in America's interest to push for a Palestinian state! Then there's Freedom's Watch board member and spokesman Ari Fleischer. Three years ago I heard him tell a Jewish audience in Cincinnati that they should vote for Bush because he had helped make Israel safer with the Iraq war. And as for the the director of the new group, Brad Blakeman, last year at the end of Israel's botched and gruesome Lebanon war, Blakeman, an Orthodox Jew, said on MSNBC: Israel ... could have wiped out Lebanon in a day if they chose to. They chose not to. [Israel] knows exact what it‘s doing. Israel is protecting their borders. Israel is fighting with one hand tied behind their back. They‘re fighting according to international law. Blakeman had worked in the Bush White House. His brother Bruce told the Forward that Bush launched the Iraq war partly out of concern for Israel. "The president realized not only that Saddam Hussein was a danger to America, but that Saddam Hussein had designs on attacking Israel," said Blakeman, whose brother Brad is a former Bush aide. "There was a concern that an attack on Israel would turn into a regional war, with Syria and Iran joining in on Iraq's side." Among donors to Freedom's Watch are real estate kingpin Richard Fox, who is the head of the unreconstructed neoconservative Jewish Policy Center. And casino mogul Sheldon Adelson, who has lately donated $60 million to Birthright, the program that seeks to indoctrinate young American Jews in a love of Israel by paying for a free trip there before they turn 26 (gentiles need not apply!). Most of the leaders of this group live and breathe Israel, but this overarching concern is nowhere to be found in their calls on Americans to sacrifice more blood and treasure in Iraq. When they talk about threats to the region, they are talking about Israel's security. And the press lets them get away with this subterfuge, with the exception of the Jewish Telegraphic Agency. The Washington Post, for instance, was happy to suggest that the organization is a "White House front," but said nothing about the Jewish character of the board, or those Jews' view of Israel. Politico was also silent on the issue. In a second piece, the Washington Post reported that one board member leads neocon cipher Scooter Libby's defense committee. I wish the Post would ask these guys what they think about Israel. Nope, they're all afraid to mention it. Again I note, there's nothing wrong with rightwingers expressing their views. The problem is when those views have a religious character that they're not upfront about, and that the press declines to discuss. Any one else bringing a religious worldview to American politics is described as doing just that. We constantly hear about the "evangelical" voters or the "Christian right." What about the Jewish right? Especially now, when there's a widespread apprehension in the country that the Israel-centric Jewish right pushed this disastrous war.

To: sea_urchin who wrote (16201)	8/29/2007 4:22:15 AM
From: GUSTAVE JAEGER	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 22250

Re: > I call them "racists" for the very simple reason that the so-called "national integrity" you're alluding to is based on RACE! Hence you should rather call it "racial integrity". Crap. You are obsessed with race. Searle, isn't it time for you to buy new reading glasses? Can you read the demonstrators' placards in the picture below? Message 23786155

To: sea_urchin who wrote (16201)	8/29/2007 4:46:02 AM
From: GUSTAVE JAEGER	Respond to of 22250

Re: Many people of colour have applied and have gained access to the US. Of course, they may prefer whites,.... You bet! LA VOZ DE AZTLAN EDITORIAL Los Angeles, Alta California August 2, 2007 Whites threaten "Race War" against Mexican-Americans and other Latinos There has been increasing talk of a "Race War" against Mexican-Americans and other Latinos on White hate web sites and on discussion forums run by mainstream news services. Commentaries of an impending race war are not just being articulated by White supremacist crazies through anonymous postings on Internet forums but have also been insinuated by the likes of former Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger, who warned of a war with Mexico, and more recently by former candidate for US President Patrick Buchanan in his book "The Death of the West". In a July 15, 2007 article, we reported on how an online forum sponsored by Time Warner's American Online (AOL) was being utilized to urge Whites to arm themselves and "kill the beaners". One posting said, "If You Are Not Armed Now You better get that way fast." Most disturbing is that these sort of discussions are now taking place on forums sponsored by mainstream news services such as the Orange County Register newspaper in California and on many others. On July 28 in the Daily Sentinel of Colorado the following statement was published: "This kind of thing is happening all over the country. The unwelcome invading parasites who shouldn't even be here have declared open season on Whites. It's an escalating race war against Whites, but most Whites don't realize what's happening yet. God help the invaders when Whites are cornered and finally forced to fight back. There will be a huge race war in the USA. Count on it. Be prepared." What do these disturbing and frightening commentaries signify for the Mexican-American and Latino communities? Many of us here in Southern California have not forgotten that horrific day of July 18, 1984 when an anti-Mexican racist massacred 22, mostly women and children, at a McDonald's Restaurant in San Ysidro, California. On that day a racist killer named James Oliver Huberty put on military style clothing and told his wife he was going hunting for Mexicans. James Oliver Huberty is today revered by many Minutemen vigilantes as the "father" of their movement. In today's anti-Mexican environment these types of incidents can rapidly escalate. What are we to do? We must begin implementing community defense strategies. Last night, Augustin Aguayo, the courageous US soldier who refused to kill Iraqi civilians, spoke on "La Causa" program of KPFK radio in Los Angeles. He said that the reason he became a "Conscientious Objector" and refused to return to Iraq was that he became aware of the racist nature of the war against the Iraqi people. We also remember Andres Raya, the decorated US Marine who decided to bring "Fallujah" back to his hometown of Ceres, California. We need to tap into military trained veterans, that number in the tens of thousands just in California, to provide a defense of our communities just in case the White crazies decide to do something foolish. aztlan.net

To: sea_urchin who wrote (16201)	8/29/2007 4:51:09 AM
From: GUSTAVE JAEGER	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 22250

The Israelization of the US --or how US Nativists will soon tell us that "wetbacks" are actually "camouflaged Islamists": America's 'Palestinians' Posted: November 15, 2001 1:00 a.m. Eastern President Bush says he wants to see a Palestinian state carved out of Israel. He may be surprised some day soon when that statement and his recent actions in support of it come back to bite him. Why? Activists who see themselves as "America's Palestinians" are gearing up a movement to carve out of the southwestern United States – a region (called Aztlan) including all of Bush's home state of Texas – a sovereign Hispanic state called the Republica del Norte. The leaders of this movement are meeting continuously with extremists from the Islamic world, and you can read for yourself how they have been inspired by the Palestinian cause, and even adopted the most vicious forms of anti-Semitism in the process, by reading their own words on their own website. "There are great similarities between the political and economic condition of the Palestinians in occupied Palestine and that of La Raza in the southwest United States," explains an editorial from earlier this year in La Voz de Aztlan in Los Angeles, the city seen as the future capital of the new Hispanic state. Los Angeles, you see, is the southwestern U.S. version of Jerusalem. Ridiculous? It didn't go unnoticed among the Aztlan activists when Los Angeles Mayor James Hahn told Mexico's President Vincente Fox last week, referring to Los Angeles: "Our city is a Mexican city." The editorial goes on to draw analogies between the Arab uprising in Israel and gang violence in Los Angeles. It's the same thing, the activists claim. This is not crime and punishment, according to the La Raza (literally, "The Race") activists, this is the birth of an independence movement by young Hispanics. "The similarities are many," says the editorial. "The primary one, of course, is the fact that both La Raza and the Palestinians have been displaced by invaders that have utilized military means to conquer and occupy our territories. The takeover of our respective lands by foreign elements occurred 100 years apart. For La Raza, it happened in 1848 when Mexico lost the southwest at the end of the Mexican-American war and the signing of the Treaty of Guadalupe-Hidlago. For the Palestinians, it occurred in 1948 when the Zionist Jewish People's Council gathered at the Tel Aviv Museum and signed the 'Declaration of the Establishment of the State of Israel' on the day in which the British Mandate over Palestine expired." Are you getting the picture? This idiotic movement takes on special meaning, however, after Sept. 11. There is a growing body of evidence to suggest terrorists have used America's unpatrolled, unguarded borders with Mexico and Canada to infiltrate our country and to bring in arms and munitions. It's about time the American people learned there is an organized fifth column of U.S. activists who would be only too glad to assist Islamic terrorists in their jihad against the Yankee imperialists. This is an alliance long in the making. But please keep in mind what I am telling you today. This is not a column about illegal aliens. This is not a column about problems with the border. This is not a column about how our culture is being changed by mass migration. This is a story about a movement to create a new state within the borders of the continental United States. And the logic and rationale for this movement is the same logic and rationale (if you can call it that) being employed to make the case for a Palestinian state. Americans need to understand this argument can and will be used against them – soon. Fidel Castro has, not surprisingly, lent his support to this independence movement. California politicians pay lip service to it and kowtow to its demands. It may seem irrelevant. It may seem innocuous. It may seem like little more than an annoyance. But today – after Sept. 11 – it represents a national security threat. Meanwhile, President Bush ignores this budding "intifada" in his own back yard and chooses, instead, to tell the Israelis they must carve up their own tiny state to make a homeland for dangerous radicals who want only to destroy them. And remember, these independence movements are never really about the creation of autonomous states. Instead, they are diversionary movements designed, ultimately, to destroy existing states – in the Middle East, Israel and in the West, the United States of America. -------------------------------------------- Don't miss Joseph Farah's exclusive report "Jihad in America" in the November issue of Whistleblower magazine, WorldNetDaily's monthly offline publication. Order your subscription now. Joseph Farah is founder, editor and CEO of WND and a nationally syndicated columnist with Creators Syndicate. His latest book is "Stop The Presses: The Inside Story of the New Media Revolution." He also edits the online intelligence newsletter Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin, in which he utilizes his sources developed over 30 years in the news business. worldnetdaily.com La Raza = Al Qaeda ?