Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (13923)	8/28/2007 12:44:20 PM
From: Ann Corrigan	Respond to of 224724

Is Barney Frank celibate?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (13923)	8/28/2007 1:05:54 PM
From: longnshort	Respond to of 224724

Why don't you want all the votes counted ???

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (13923)	8/30/2007 6:08:03 AM
From: tonto	Respond to of 224724

Kenneth, you are the biggest hypocrite posting on SI... To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (79350) 5/7/2007 6:07:34 PM From: tonto 1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 83900 Nice spin, but you clearly stated that if employment taxes were lowered, you could afford to provide health benefits...which of course is a terrible excuse for not providing health insurance to your only employee. Shameful... Your employee would be much better off receiving health benefits which are tax free than a "higher" wage as you obviously lied about...you are not making any sense. You are a cheap hypocrite. To: David Lawrence who wrote (309807) 10/19/2002 3:36:40 PM From: Kenneth E. Phillipps Read Replies (1) of 761923 So you don't favor a cut in payroll taxes. Such a cut would allow me to pay MY Secretary some health care benefits. I don't need such a plan because the taxpayers already pay for mine through MY WIFE's federal employment.