Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Steve Lokness who wrote (217468)	8/28/2007 3:25:08 PM
From: DMaA	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793841

You're pretty generous with your advice. If Romney didn't know, he should fire his staff and start over.

To: Steve Lokness who wrote (217468)	8/28/2007 3:46:27 PM
From: the_wheel	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793841

How come I am always the last to know???? Tell me the truth, are the rumors about a certain female candidate also true? Say it ain't so, Steve.

To: Steve Lokness who wrote (217468)	8/28/2007 3:57:57 PM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 793841

So you think Romney should have known because of gossip about Craig? Do you know what kind of gossip there is about Hillary? There are people who will tell you she's a lesbian, or that she's had her own affairs (supposedly with Vince Foster - there are a couple ex AR state cops who say they saw his hands squeezing her butt and her hanging all over him), or that the Clintons's have a sham marriage of political convenience (that last one I think is true currently). No I'm not angry "as if you're responsible for Craig's mischief" - what you're responsible for is trying to slander Romney over it. "Why not hold Craig responsible?" Excellent idea - now apply that to Romney. BTW while I will support Romney if nominated, I'm not a Romney guy. Just hate to see him unfairly slandered.