SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: John Carragher who wrote (217560)8/29/2007 7:20:41 AM
From: JDN  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793931
 
Yes, the whole thing is prepostorous. What I believe Craig is guilty of is STUPIDITY. He should have shut his yap, called his attorney and said THIS COPS NUTS. Imagin a cop sits in a stall for hours (we all know how that smells), that alone surely indicates this Cop is OVERZEALOUS. jdn



To: John Carragher who wrote (217560)8/29/2007 10:39:55 AM
From: Steve Lokness  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793931
 
John;

republicans have already hung the guy

Do you think he is innocent? I asked you some questions about the Statesman and they were a serious question on the chance he was indeed innocent.

Personally I think he pulled a Clinton. He said he was not a homosexual, but if I had made the speech, I would have said (If it was true) ....that I had never had sex with anyone but a woman. I would also have said.....I did not solicit sex in the train station bathroom. One thing for sure, claiming he is innocent sure does give the story a life of it's own.

As to Romney; I only asked a question yesterday. With his answer on Kudlow - I give him a pass on this.

steve