Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Epic American Credit and Bond Bubble Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: russwinter who wrote (85722)	8/30/2007 12:03:09 PM
From: TRINDY	Respond to of 110194

Greetings. I, for one among whom I consider likely to be many, greatly appreciate the tracking that you do of the Fed's activities. This is a very important time to be monitoring their activities and your reports are very insightful. Thanks for the good work at this especially crucial time. Cheers!

To: russwinter who wrote (85722)	8/30/2007 12:18:58 PM
From: stan_hughes	Respond to of 110194

Russ, re: collateral shortage issues, did you see this recent piece by Richard Shaw? Subprime Crisis Hits Municipal Bond Market We can still remember when people were telling us that the subprime crisis was confined to U.S. housing — that it was not a big deal in the final analysis. Well, the final analysis is not in yet, but oh were they wrong. Not only is the subprime crisis not confined to U.S. housing — it is rippling through the entire U.S. and world economy. The Federal Reserve, European Central Bank [ECB], and the Bank of Japan [BOJ] have injected liquidity . The ECB and BOJ have talked about deferring expected short-term interest rate increases. The People’s Bank of China has been talking up the dollar in response the crisis. One U.S. money market fund issuer has filed for bankruptcy and the large French insurer, AXA, had to infuse money to avoid “breaking a buck” on one of its money market funds. The U.S subprime crisis is not just a U.S. housing problem, it is an overall problem for the U.S. and world economy. For a further example, last week, the Bank of China (#2 bank in China) announced that it holds $9.7 billion of U.S. subprime mortgage debt and has begun putting up new loss reserves for that. The reserves are only $152 million so far, but when Chinese banks start having U.S. subprime problems, we’d say the problem is not domestic, is not contained and is not likely fully revealed. We’d like to add an anecdote from our firm’s direct experience to further illuminate the situation. Last week, we managed the bid process for a municipal bond refinancing and the market information was astounding. In a municipal bond refinancing a city that has muni bond proceeds that need temporary investment prior to use will invest the bond proceeds to generate income to pay the coupon on the muni bonds. One method — the one we were hired to manage — is to ask a major institution to provide a guaranteed fixed return for a specified period for a particular sum of money, but with full flexibility for the municipality to withdraw funds as may be required during the life of the guarantee. That is called a “flexible bond repurchase (repo) agreement”. Normally, the bid manager (that’s us) would send a request for proposal to a significant number of large, high credit quality banking, insurance and investment banking institutions; and then sort through the responses, organize the data in a consistent way and recommend to the municipality which to chose. The selected repo issuer then puts Treasury securities in the amount of the guarantee in the hands of a third party custodian, and the custodian passes the muni bond proceeds to the repo issuer. Normally, there is serious competition from institutions to get the business, but not last week. We sent proposal requests to 20 major institutions that routinely do muni flexible repo business asking for a 90 day repo for $20 million and a 1 year repo for another $20 million. Of the 20 institutions only 3 submitted a proposal, while 17 (85%) sent declinations. That level of non-availability is unprecedented. The reasons given in the responses from the 85% that did not make an offer were of two types: “We have no collateral available” or “We are not currently offering collateralized products.” NO COLLATERAL! NO COLLATERALIZED PRODUCTS! Those two statements represent a depletion of resources for new investment in the first case, and a general shift away from risk in the second case. The problem is popping up everywhere, and everybody is impacted. seekingalpha.com