SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elroy Jetson who wrote (68310)8/30/2007 10:47:56 PM
From: andiron  Respond to of 116555
 
market turmoil/recession/wall-street lay offs are part of the CREATIVE DESTRUCTION without which capitalism is doomed.
From the ashes comes a new lease of life: Young, vibrant and strong.
when people say that FED has managed to avoid this by some kinda policy for the last 30+ yrs, you have to wonder.



To: Elroy Jetson who wrote (68310)8/31/2007 1:28:34 AM
From: NOW  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116555
 
“Traders who would formerly have taken the precaution of reducing their
commitments just in case a reaction should set in, now feel confident that they
can ride out any storm which may develop. But more particularly, the
repeated demonstrations which the market has given of its ability to ‘come
back’ with renewed strength after a reaction has engendered a spirit of
indifference to all the old time warnings. As to whether this attitude may not
sometime itself become a danger-signal Wall Street is not agreed.”
- New York Times, September 1, 1929



To: Elroy Jetson who wrote (68310)8/31/2007 2:14:26 AM
From: benwood  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116555
 
Greenspan may have thought it was "theory" but it was just hypothesis. Spending trillions of dollars to test your hypothesis usually would be considered a bit foolish, except to the delusional. And oddly enough, there are multiple $trillion plus hypotheses being field tested simultaneously by various gov't agencies.

I think the generation between Gen-X and the Greatest Generation should be the All-In generation. But I'd rather them, ahem, *us*, Generation Whacko.