SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (106351)8/31/2007 12:16:21 PM
From: JakeStraw  Respond to of 173976
 
Kenneth, I never figured you to be homosexual, but with your unwavering focus on the subject, it now becomes quite clear...



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (106351)8/31/2007 12:22:24 PM
From: Steve Dietrich  Respond to of 173976
 
That's exactly right.

Many Preachers and Republicans ply their trade and garner support by preaching the ills of homosexuality, the danger it presents to our society. If one of them happens to be gay, they either have to hide it or find a new line of work...

The day there's no money to be made and no votes to be had by demonizing homosexuality is the day we'll stop seeing these kinds of scandals...

SD



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (106351)8/31/2007 6:59:31 PM
From: Hope Praytochange  Respond to of 173976
 
A Rueful Return To Chinagate?
By INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY | Posted Wednesday, August 29, 2007 4:20 PM PT

National Security: It's not a Buddhist temple, but the shady fundraising methods look the same. Like Al Gore, who took laundered cash, Sen. Hillary Clinton's got some explaining to do.
The presidential hopeful pocketed $55,000 from a family of Chinese immigrants living in a modest house near the San Francisco airport. The Paw family, headed by a mail carrier, is one of the biggest sources of donations to her campaign.

Turns out the gifts were bundled together by Paw family friend Norman Hsu, a Chinese businessman who at one time owned its 1,280-square-foot house. Hsu (pronounced "shoo") now lives in New York, where he ranks as one of Hillary's top rainmakers, quietly raising well over $1 million for her campaign.

Though his donations closely track the Paw's, Hsu denies reimbursing them for their contributions. It's a federal crime to reimburse donors for campaign gifts. (It's also a crime to knowingly accept gifts made by donors in the name of others.)

Hillary's campaign spokesman insists the senator has "absolutely no reason to call his contributions into question."

California authorities may beg to differ. According to the Los Angeles Times, Hsu is a fugitive who last decade was convicted of grand theft and sentenced to three years in prison.

This story has an eerily familiar ring to it.

In 1996, Bill Clinton benefited from another suspicious source of funds in California. He dispatched Gore to raise hundreds of thousands in cash from a Buddhist temple in Los Angeles.

Chinese bagman John Huang — a longtime friend of the Clintons dating back to Little Rock — laundered the dough through monks and nuns who had taken an oath of poverty.

Huang was convicted of raising more than $1 million in illegal contributions, mostly from people with close ties to Beijing. His partner in crime, Maria Hsia — also an agent of the Chinese government — raised some $117,000 in illegally laundered donations for the Clinton-Gore campaign.

Is the mysterious Mr. Hsu the Clintons' new John Huang? It's a serious question, and one with national security implications.

While Chinese funny money was pouring into Clinton coffers, the Clinton administration oversaw the wholesale transfer of advanced missile, nuclear and supercomputer techology to China.

Meantime, Clinton liberalized trade policy with China, something for which Hsu himself has lobbied.

It seems like the same M.O. — rich Chinese donating through cut-outs and conduits to steer the Clintons and Democrats toward favorable Beijing policies. Hsu also has donated heavily to other Democrats who last decade were on the receiving end of Chinese funny money — namely Sens. John Kerry, Ted Kennedy and Dianne "Chi-Fi" Feinstein.

Hillary wasn't measuring drapes in the White House when all this Chinese funny business was going on. She personally took checks from Chinese bagman Johnny Chung when he visited the White House. Chung is another fundraiser convicted of laundering donations.

Last decade, the Clintons took millions in laundered foreign campaign donations, mostly from China. Many of the bagmen were convicted. In fact, the Chinagate investigation successfully prosecuted 25 outlaw fundraisers for Bill Clinton and Democrats. That haul came in spite of Janet Reno blocking investigators' efforts at the Justice Department.

Heading the probe in the Senate was one Fred Thompson. He was vilified by the Clintonites and their apologists in the media for conducting a witch hunt. Of course, he was right about the Chinese contributions all along.

Thompson, who plans to enter the race for the White House, has a special appreciation for what the Clintons pulled last decade. How appropriate if he ends up debating Hillary next year. He'd have lots of fodder.

Meantime, the FEC must launch an investigation of the Hsu donations. American voters have the right to know now — not after the election is over — if the Clintons aren't simply laundering Chinese bagmen who will launder millions more to elect a new President Clinton who, in turn, will hold another fire sale for the Chi-Coms.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (106351)8/31/2007 7:05:26 PM
From: Hope Praytochange  Respond to of 173976
 
Norman Hsu’s attorney, Jim Brosnahan, told The Wall Street Journal that he arranged to pay the $2 million bond that was set by Judge H. James Ellis of San Mateo County Superior Court. The money “can also be used for restitution to any persons who might still be unpaid,” he added.

Mr. Hsu was facing up to three years in prison after pleading no contest to a charge that he had defrauded investors, but he skipped out on a court appearance and was not seen until today.

Also today, Mr. Hsu cut ties on with The New School, where he was a board member and where a scholarship is offered in his name. In a news release, the school said that he had “no involvement” with fund-raising activities.

Bob Kerrey, the president of The New School and a former Democratic senator, said he was introduced to Mr. Hsu about two years ago, and shortly thereafter Mr. Hsu joined the board of governors at the Eugene Lang College for liberal arts. He joined the university’s board of trustees last July.

“So much of the university is about the immigrant culture, and I liked his personal story, coming from China, and he had an interest in fashion as well,” Mr. Kerrey said. “It all intrigued me.”

He said that the university did not do background checks of prospective trustees and that he saw no reason to ask Mr. Hsu to resign from its board.

From $62,000 for Gov. Eliot Spitzer of New York, to $10,000 for the Tennessee Democratic Party, the full extent of fund-raising by Mr. Hsu came into focus on Thursday, as campaigns across the country began returning his money in light of revelations that he was a fugitive in a fraud case.

Beyond the hundreds of thousands of dollars he raised from others for Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York, Mr. Hsu personally contributed more than $600,000 to federal, state and municipal candidates in the last three years, a review of campaign finance records shows. It was a startling amount of money for someone whose sources of income remained far from obvious yesterday, as visits to addresses he has provided for his businesses showed no trace of Mr. Hsu.

In interviews with Democrats, a picture emerged of Mr. Hsu as someone who was frequently tapped at all levels of politics to make a contribution, bundle checks or hold an event. John Liu, a New York City councilman who said he last spoke to Mr. Hsu a few months ago at a gathering of Asian-American Clinton supporters in Washington, said Mr. Hsu “certainly had a strong reputation” for being able to raise lots of money.

“He actually told me he doesn’t get involved in municipal elections the first time I met him, but then he went ahead and gave to my campaign, and others,” Mr. Liu said, adding that he refunded Mr. Hsu’s $4,950 donation yesterday.

The Clinton campaign has said it will give to charity $23,000 that Mr. Hsu contributed, and on Thursday representatives of Mr. Spitzer and Attorney General Andrew M. Cuomo of New York, who received $50,000 from Mr. Hsu, said they would do the same. A spokesman for Senator Barack Obama, the Illinois Democrat who is a rival of Mrs. Clinton for the party’s presidential nomination, said Mr. Obama intended to give away $7,000 that Mr. Hsu contributed to his committees.

Mrs. Clinton appeared with Mr. Spitzer on Thursday at an event in Manhattan, where she made her first public comments on the matter, saying revelations of Mr. Hsu’s past criminal problems were “a big surprise to everybody.”

“When you have as many contributors as I’m fortunate enough to have,” she said, “we do the very best job we can based on the information available to us to make appropriate vetting decisions.”

Investigators believe that after Mr. Hsu skipped his court appearance in 1992, he went to his native Hong Kong and then continued working in the garment trade. At some point, Mr. Hsu, a naturalized American citizen, returned to New York and in 2003 made the first of what became hundreds of thousands of dollars in contributions to Democratic campaigns around the nation.

People who met him said they knew only that he ran an apparel business. Efforts to learn more about his trade hit dead-ends yesterday. Visits to companies at addresses listed by Mr. Hsu on campaign finance records provided little information. There were no offices in buildings in New York’s garment district whose addresses were given for businesses with names like Components Ltd., Cool Planets, Next Components, Coopgors Ltd., NBT and Because Men’s clothing — all listed by Mr. Hsu in federal filings at different times.

At a new loft-style residential condominium in SoHo that was also listed as an address for one of his companies, an employee there said that he had never seen or heard of Mr. Hsu. Another company was listed at a condo that Mr. Hsu had sublet in an elegant residential tower in Midtown Manhattan just off Fifth Avenue, but an employee there said Mr. Hsu moved out two years ago, after having lived there for five years. The employee, who was granted anonymity because he was not authorized to talk about residents, said he recalled that Mr. Hsu had received a lot of mail from the Democratic Party.

Mike Nizza, Michael M. Grynbaum, Aron Pilhofer and Margot Williams contributed reporting.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (106351)8/31/2007 7:06:34 PM
From: Hope Praytochange  Respond to of 173976
 
By MIKE McINTIRE and LESLIE WAYNE
Published: August 31, 2007
After defying an arrest warrant since 1992, a valued and reliable rainmaker for the Democratic Party surrendered today at a California court to face a grand theft charge, according to wire reports.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (106351)9/2/2007 12:53:32 AM
From: puborectalis  Respond to of 173976
 
September 2, 2007
Op-Ed Columnist
The Kurdish Secret
By THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN
Erbil, Iraq

Iraq today is a land of contrasts — mostly black and blacker. Traveling around the central Baghdad area the past few days, I saw little that really gave me hope that the different Iraqi sects can forge a social contract to live together. The only sliver of optimism I find here is in the one region where Iraqis don’t live together: Kurdistan.

Imagine for a moment if one outcome of the U.S. invasion of Iraq had been the creation of an American University of Iraq. Imagine if we had triggered a flood of new investment into Iraq that had gone into new hotels, a big new convention center, office buildings, Internet cafes, two new international airports and Iraqi malls. Imagine if we had paved the way for an explosion of newspapers, even a local Human Rights Watch chapter, and new schools. Imagine if we had created an island of decency in Iraq, with public parks, where women could walk unveiled and not a single American soldier was ever killed — where Americans in fact were popular — and where Islam was practiced in its most tolerant and open manner. Imagine ...

Well, stop imagining. It’s all happening in Kurdistan, the northern Iraqi region, home to four million Kurds. I saw all of the above in Kurdistan’s two biggest towns, Erbil and Sulaimaniya. The Bush team just never told anybody.

No, Kurdistan is not a democracy. It has real Parliamentary elections, but the region’s executive branch is still more “Sopranos” than “West Wing,” more Singapore than Switzerland — dominated by two rival clans, the Talibanis and the Barzanis. It has a vibrant free press, as long as you don’t insult the leadership, and way too much crony-corruption. But it is democratizing, gradually nurturing the civil society and middle class needed for a real democracy.

On Oct. 17, the new American University of Iraq will open classes in Sulaimaniya. “The board wanted three campuses, one in Kurdistan, one in Baghdad and one in Basra, but this is the only part of the country where an American University can open and function safely,” said Owen Cargol, the school’s chancellor.

Iraq is a disaster in so many ways, but at least America’s invasion midwifed something really impressive in Kurdistan. And in the best way: we created the opening and the Kurds did the rest. But while the Kurds liberated their region from Saddam’s army in the 1990s — with U.S. air cover — their current renaissance was only possible, they say, thanks to the overthrow of Saddam, their mortal enemy.

“Saddam’s eyes were always on this region,” said Nechirvan Barzani, prime minister of the Kurdistan regional government. Once he was toppled, “it gave us psychological hope for the future. Those who had even a limited amount of money started to invest, start small businesses or buy a car, because they thought they could see the future. The uncertainty was removed. ... We have to thank the American people and government. But we are a lover from only one side. We love America, but nothing in response. They don’t want to give the perception that they are helping us.”

Added Hoshyar Omar, a 23-year-old student-translator: “My father was buried alive [by Saddam’s men] when I was 3. I want to thank Mr. George Bush personally. ... He may have made some bad decisions, but freeing Iraq was the best decision he has ever made. ... We had nothing and we built this Kurdistan that you see.”

Why is Kurdistan America’s best-kept secret success? Because the Bush team is afraid the Kurds will break away. But the Kurds have no interest in splitting from Iraq now. Iraq’s borders protect them from Turkey, Iran and Syria.

The Kurdish autonomous zone should be our model for Iraq. Does George Bush or Condi Rice have a better idea? Do they have any idea? Right now, we’re surging aimlessly. Iraq’s only hope is radical federalism — with Sunnis, Shiites and Kurds each running their own affairs, and Baghdad serving as an A.T.M., dispensing cash for all three. Let’s get that on the table — now.

Months after Saddam’s capture, a story made the rounds that he was asked, “If you were set free, could you stabilize Iraq again?” He supposedly said it would take him only “one hour and 10 minutes — one hour to go home and shower and 10 minutes to reunify Iraq.” Maybe an iron-fisted dictator could do that. America can’t.

“No one here accepts to be ruled ever again by the other,” Kosrat Ali, Kurdistan’s vice president, told me. “If you get all the American forces to occupy all of the towns and the cities of Iraq, you might be able to centralize Iraq again. That is the only way.” Otherwise, “centralized rule is finished in Iraq.”



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (106351)9/3/2007 7:45:56 PM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 173976
 
Democrat culture of corruption.....

Hsu-nami News: Norman Hsu Linked to China Missile Trader
World Net Daily is reporting today on the links between Norman Hsu and Bernard L. Schwartz, the well known China missile trader:

Hsu has lots of suspicious connections. Not even in office and already Clinton scandals return.

A shady Chinese megadonor to Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign has close ties to an aerospace mogul accused of placing his business interests before national security by sharing missile secrets with Beijing during the Clinton administration.

Before his forced resignation last week, Norman Yuan Yuen Hsu (pictured with Hillary) sat on the board of trustees of the liberal New School university in New York with former Loral Corp. head Bernard L. Schwartz, who was allowed to transfer restricted satellite and missile technology to a People's Liberation Army front after contributing a record amount of cash to President Clinton's 1996 campaign.

Last November, Schwartz and Hsu chaired a New School banquet at the Mandarin Oriental in New York which featured Sen. Clinton as keynote speaker. Clinton steered a $1 million federal grant to the college.

More recently, Schwartz and Hsu (pronounced shoo) appeared together at the New York Yacht Club for Democratic Rep. Patrick Kennedy's 40th birthday bash...

All told, 22 Democrat donors were convicted in the Chinagate probe, which the Justice Department officially closed a few years ago.
Hat Tip Cornhusker

Loral's Bernard Schwartz with President Clinton during a June 1997 Democratic fund-raiser in Washington. (AP File Photo)

Woah!... Even Far-Left Daily Kos is reporting this!
Golem666 at Daily Kos has this on Norman Hsu and Bernard L. Shwartz:
Bernard L. Schwartz, who worked for the chinese shell company that the clintons gave the ballisitc missle technology to after bill clintons re-election put Norman Hsu on the Board of Trustees of the New School in N.Y

hillary clinton ear-marked 750,000 dollars to the new school recently as a pork barrel project.

Bernard L. Schwartz taught the Communist Chinese party how to build ICBM's which could make it out of the lower atmosphere.

this was one of the main reasons that china was able to destroy a satellite in space this year, touching of fears of a new arms race in space.

because of the technology that the clinton's gave to Bernard L. Schwartz, who worked with china.

this is all related...

bernard schwarz and norman hsu are both on the board of this school and they work together on several projects outside of the school.

connect the dots, a bankrupt chinese national wanted on a felony of fraud, connected to this individual who gave away national security secrets, working with the chinese government. Suddenly comes into huge wealth and starts donating hundreds of thousands of dollars to the leading democratic nominee for president. it is no accident. Or is it?

since nobody as far as i can tell so far has linked these events, we will have to see how this is played out and what it means.

Edit: it turns out that Norman Hsu has known connections to the chinese nationals who were involved in the clinton scandal of 96. He also has been found by the NY and LA times to have several shell companys that do not exist. On top of this. He had dealings with the Chinese mafia. read below for my update.
MORE DONOR PROBLEMS...
An appellate court is set to hear arguments in Paul vs. Clinton case this week.

And... The WaPo reported on another Clinton Campaign Finance Fiasco today.

Michelle Malkin has Bill's reaction to the fugitive/shady donors.

Previously:
Surprise!... Lawsuit Ties Clintons to Shady Marketing Firm
Hillary Implicated In "Largest Election Law Fraud in History"
WANTED: Major Hillary Campaign Contributor & Swindler
WANTED: Another Hillary Donor- This One Is Sought By FBI!!
More Bum News For Hillary... Hsu Named in 1996 Communist China Donations Scandal
Democrats Hit By Hsu-nami... Hillary Donor Case Goes to Court!

POSTED BY GATEWAY PUNDIT
gatewaypundit.blogspot.com