Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Israel to U.S. : Now Deal with Syria and Iran -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sea_urchin who wrote (16245)	9/1/2007 10:17:03 AM
From: sea_urchin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 22250

> the longer the US remains embroiled in its present wars of fantasy the worse it will be The opinion of Charley Reese: antiwar.com >>A New Motto for America I have a rifle, a shotgun and a few rounds of ammunition locked away in my gun safe. Should I learn that enemy soldiers are landing on the beach, I will hobble down to the dunes and kill as many of them as I can before they kill me. That being said, as long as foreign folk stay on their side of the border, I don't give a birdie's tweet what they do or say or think. We should drop the motto "In God We Trust" and adopt a new one, "Let Us Mind Our Own Business." Isolationism, as defined by George Washington, is an exceedingly good policy. Washington warned us in his "Farewell Address" to steer clear of entangling alliances, foreign quarrels and feuds. They don't concern us, he said. Our only concerns, vis-à-vis foreign powers, should be friendship and commerce. We should treat all countries equally, granting neither favors nor trying to harm anyone. The only leaders we should be concerned about are our own. God knows we have a difficult time choosing good ones among our own people without worrying about the leaders people in other countries choose or have to live under. Given the economy, the poverty, the decaying infrastructure and the enormous mountains of debt, we have enough on our plate without trying to solve any other country's problems. We should end foreign aid, abolish the CIA and withdraw from all international organizations, including the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Americans would be astounded at how much money they could save if we shucked the empire, and pretty soon they would be amazed at how much the rest of the world actually liked us once we quit interfering in their lives. I am, of course, indulging in wishful thinking. The empire is very profitable for an elite few. Every foreigner with his hand in our treasury has hired lobbyists and public-relations firms to make sure it stays there. On the whole, Congress is gutless and, to a large extent, brainless. Some members are outright crooks, and others have oiled the zippers on their trousers. They are in love with the sound of their own voices. Most are contemptuous of the voters, confident they can dupe enough of them for a slim majority at the next election. There are a handful of honorable public servants, but they are such a minority and so studiously ignored by the corporate media that chances of improvement from within are slim to none. And let's face it: We the American people, beneficiaries of a free republic, are on the whole woefully ignorant, woefully apathetic and woefully selfish. I used to tease my friend at the local chamber of commerce who fancied himself a conservative. I called him a long-distance conservative. He wanted the federal government to save money by not spending any in Oregon, but he lusted after every federal dollar he could lure to his own city. Local media are likewise. They will openly upbraid a congressman who fails to bring home the bacon, now referred to as an "earmark." We may or may not be too incompetent to run our own country, but there is no doubt that we are incompetent to rule the world. President Bush, who seems to wish he were Caesar, makes one blunder after another. The only question remaining is, Will he run out of term before he runs out of opportunities to finish wrecking the country? He's made a pretty complete mess of the Middle East and seems intent on restarting the Cold War with Russia. As a measure of his stupidity, even as the angry Russians resume regular flights of their long-range strategic nuclear bombers, he is moving the North American Aerospace Defense Command out of its protective mountain bunker and into an office building. Now that's smart, eh? <<

To: sea_urchin who wrote (16245)	9/2/2007 9:35:45 PM
From: philv	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 22250

The talk of military intervention and war goes on. September 2, 2007 Pentagon ‘three-day blitz’ plan for Iran "THE Pentagon has drawn up plans for massive airstrikes against 1,200 targets in Iran, designed to annihilate the Iranians’ military capability in three days, according to a national security expert. Alexis Debat, director of terrorism and national security at the Nixon Center, said last week that US military planners were not preparing for “pinprick strikes” against Iran’s nuclear facilities. “They’re about taking out the entire Iranian military,” he said. Debat was speaking at a meeting organised by The National Interest, a conservative foreign policy journal. He told The Sunday Times that the US military had concluded: “Whether you go for pinprick strikes or all-out military action, the reaction from the Iranians will be the same.” It was, he added, a “very legitimate strategic calculus”. President George Bush intensified the rhetoric against Iran last week, accusing Tehran of putting the Middle East “under the shadow of a nuclear holocaust”. He warned that the US and its allies would confront Iran “before it is too late”." more at: timesonline.co.uk Also this from the U.K. as well: "Will President Bush bomb Iran?" telegraph.co.uk