SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: carranza2 who wrote (21862)9/1/2007 5:48:59 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217749
 
laugh a little :0)

Barrons "Up & Down Wall Street"

UP AND DOWN WALL STREET
By ALAN ABELSON



Bailout Bandwagon
WHAT'S WRONG WITH PEOPLE? Have they lost any sense of decency? Can't they stop and consider for just a moment before they get so gosh darn lathered up and express all sorts of ill feeling and contumely toward a grande dame (French for great dame), and one only recently laid to rest?

We're talking about Leona Helmsley, who, and not for the first time (although the first time from beyond the grave), created such a hullabaloo. Mrs. Helmsley, you might remember, drew the hoi polloi's ire some years back when she observed that only the little people pay taxes, an incontestable fact any hedge-fund manager could verify, but one that nonetheless ultimately led to a probe by the feds of her own tax-paying habits, which landed her in the hoosegow.

What stirred up the natives last week was revelation of the bequest in her will of $12 million to her Maltese terrier, Trouble, coupled with her pointed omission from the list of beneficiaries of two of her grandchildren. So what's the problem?

Did the snubbed grandkids ever wag their little tails as did Trouble when Leona came home completely worn out from an onerous day's shopping for jewelry at Tiffany's, shoes at Ferragamo and purses at Prada? Did those kids ever utter a sympathetic whine or climb into her lap and lick her palms as Trouble did when husband Harry inadvertently said something mean to her? Are you kidding?

Why, then, pick on Leona when she leaves a bundle to the dog and cuts the grandchildren out? And if, to assuage her grief, Trouble thinks she needs a mate, as chance would have it, we've got just the dog for the little cutie. And she still would have $11 million left for such necessities as a mink-lined car seat when she's chauffeured around town and a new diamond-encrusted collar (frankly, and we'd never say so to Trouble, but that old diamond-encrusted number is a little tacky).

The same shameful lack of compassion was grossly in evidence in the reaction to the disclosure of the arrest of Larry Craig, the senator from Idaho, for allegedly soliciting sex in a men's room at the Minneapolis-St. Paul Airport. Besides being a muckamuck in the world's greatest deliberative body, until his rest-room mishap, Mr. Craig was a major figure in Mitt Romney's campaign for the presidential nomination.

Actually, Mr. Craig was the victim of some bad luck. The fellow in the next stall whom the senator was accused of soliciting happened to be an undercover cop. Always on the lookout for votes, Mr. Craig, innocently hoping to ingratiate himself by shaking hands with a potential Romney supporter, slipped his fingers into the adjoining stall several times, which was somehow interpreted as a sexual gesture. Mr. Craig denies any such intentions, and we believe him. Just as we do not credit similar allegations against the co-chairman of John McCain's Florida campaign.

Still, we can't see the harm if such facilities were required to post a discreet warning, something on the order of "Caution advised: Republican politicians may be present."

But let's face it, the economic news is more than a little fretful these days, what with the mounting credit fiasco, the profound and worsening slump in housing and the wild swoons and surges in the stock market. Little wonder that folks rush to seize upon such diversionary trifles as the late Mrs. Helmsley's unusual will or Sen. Craig's men's-room shenanigans for temporary balm for their worries. So that Leona leaves $12 million to Trouble, rather than to Michael Vick, or that Sen. Craig thunders against gay marriage but has always been mute on gay sex, deserves not censure or ridicule, but gratitude for providing us with a brief respite from overly obsessing on more dismaying matters.

What better proof is there that the mounting credit crisis and its vast potential to do damage to the economy and your average Joe and Jane's well-being is a clear and present danger than that even the White House has been forced to evince alarm and pledge to provide aid and comfort to impecunious homeowners. So much for the president's stout resolve, voiced on more than one occasion over the past six years, not to change his mind because it would "mean arguing" with himself.

Making the about-face all the more abrupt is that Mr. Bush a scant few weeks earlier fingered as the culprit for the subprime disaster and the tsunami of delinquencies and foreclosures it has touched off the failure of folks to read the fine print in their mortgage agreements, leaving the distinct impression that the solution for the dispossessed is to consult the nearest ophthalmologist.

On Friday, however, in a change of script that was as surprising for its timing as for its substance, he allowed as how the Devil (his nickname for Uncle Sam) might be enlisted to ease the pain of the delinquent and foreclosed masses. And the crowd, at least on Wall Street, went bananas.

Which, just conceivably, may have been the real point of the exercise.

WHAT IS MORE THAN PASSING strange is that Mr. Bush chose seemingly at the last minute to do his "to the rescue" bit the very morning that Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke was slated to address housing and its discontents at Jackson Hole, Wyo. We're not really into conspiracy theory, but at the very least, you can reasonably hazard that the White House cabal had a pretty good notion, if not an actual copy, of what Mr. Bernanke intended to say. That suggests two likely possibilities.

The first is that while pretty much assuring the world he'd cut rates expeditiously, both his tone and caveats seem too measured to satisfy the political fire-eaters (a.k.a. advisers) surrounding -- some might call it smothering -- the president. The second is those same devious types, reckoning correctly that even Mr. Bernanke's tempered expression of concern about the parlous state of housing and the mortgage mess would give stocks a shot-in-the-arm, were determined that Mr. Bush get a big helping of the credit.

Barry Ritholtz, the canny market watcher and proprietor of the eponymous Ritholtz Capital Partners, also finds the timing of the president's remarks "intriguing." He points out that not only did they upstage Mr. Bernanke's eagerly awaited speech, but they came on the eve of a three-day weekend, the last day of the month and the last day of the fiscal year for some financial firms.

If you're "introducing a major economic policy initiative that was going to address a major issue," he wonders, "wouldn't you wait until Tuesday? It's only four days away," and he notes that "this is a huge vacation week and many people aren't around." Which, we might interject, makes for a very thin market, all the more likely, as those wily advisers were no doubt aware, to produce a rousing response to the slightest hint of a bail-out for hard-pressed homeowners and, of course, lenders as well.

To Barry, it all smacks of politics rather than policy, as well as a desire to give a lift to big investment banks, precisely when they could use one most. The group, as you may have noticed, has been floundering badly of late, both in the marketplace and the stock market.

THE IRONY IS THAT MR. BUSH'S proposals may have served a function in goosing a very nervous stock market but aren't likely to yield much else than disillusionment.

A hedge-fund manager quoted by Barry sums it up rather persuasively: "I don't see anything in Bush's plan that will change the insolvency of the home buyer. The 'system' is illiquid (and that 'problem' was addressed by the central banks two weeks ago), but the 'borrowers' are insolvent. Nothing I've seen yet changes that fact. Nothing. Besides, has this administration, which doesn't believe in government programs, ever done anything well bureaucratically?"

Softening the tax bite on mortgage write downs and allowing homeowners who are delinquent by more than three months and who have a decent credit history to switch into a Federal Housing Administration loan carrying a lower interest rate will effect modest fixes, but are no big deal. Certainly, given the wretched condition of housing, the inexorable decline in home prices and the prospect of a huge resetting upwards of adjustable-rate mortgages over the next 12 months, with a big spike in March '08, we're talking Band-Aids rather than serious relief.

Now that the president, however tentatively, is officially on board, the bailout bandwagon is sure to pick up speed, volume and passengers, particularly with an election year looming. That could mean, as the sharp rise in the price of gold, up over $7 an ounce on Friday, gives fair warning, a rash of fiscal fecklessness, fresh debasement of the dollar and that most unenviable of economic combinations -- no growth and inflation.

What it doesn't mean is a return to the good old days of easy and just about free credit and all the nice bubbly things that went with it. Nor, we fear, does it portend even a modest rebound in housing in the next 12 months. The party's definitely over and no one's sorrier than we are. It sure was fun to watch.




To: carranza2 who wrote (21862)9/1/2007 5:51:14 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217749
 
Cry a little ;0/
online.barrons.com

The Bulls Have It!
By KOPIN TAN

TO CALL THIS SUMMER A NERVOUS one for investors is to traffic in understatement. The stock market suffered its first correction in 4½ years when the Standard & Poor's 500 skidded 12% recently. The Dow Jones Industrial Average makes triple-digit jumps or slides -- often within a single day. The mood swings come fast and furious as mortgage defaults rise, lending conditions tighten and traders grapple with the impact on the economy. And that's all before September, traditionally a volatile month for stocks.

So it might be reassuring to some -- and surprising to others -- to hear how Wall Street's top strategists calmly expect stocks to finish the year higher. In fact, the eight strategists surveyed by Barron's see stocks climbing well into 2008, despite the credit-market tumult and the policy uncertainty of the election year.


The average forecast among the eight calls for the S&P 500 to reach 1568 by New Year's Eve, or 6.4% higher than today's level of 1474, and even the most cautious have penciled in hardly any downside for stocks. In contrast, their economic prognosis is far less assured and unanimous: Three firms see economic threats grave enough to require the Federal Reserve to slash interest rates to 4.5%, from 5.25% today, while two others think the economy is doing just fine.

The strategists' bullish tilt is especially remarkable considering how many believe the financial markets have altered for good, with the days of easy money and cheap debt fading like the summer heat. "We've been through a long period of extraordinarily easy credit, and there's no putting that genie back into that bottle," says Tom McManus, Banc of America Securities' chief investment strategist.

Instead, what lies ahead is "a multiyear period of credit rationalization, reduced leverage and less speculation, and a shift toward more fundamental investing," says Merrill Lynch chief investment strategist Richard Bernstein. "We're not going back to how things were -- not even if the Fed cuts rates and floods the market with money."


Larry Adam
Deutsche Bank
S&P 500
Year End:1550
12 Months: 1650
10-yr Treasury Yield: 5.0%
Fed-Funds Rate: 5.0%
S&P 500 Op Profits '07E: $96
'08E: $107

Favored Sectors: Info tech, health care, industrials, energySo what drives their sanguine stock outlook? The strategists expect U.S. profit growth to accelerate, driven by the engine of a global economic boom. All are counting on interest rates staying meekly cooperative.

Over the past few years, strategists have generally been bullish in Barron's twice-yearly surveys -- and they have mostly been right. The jury is still out for this year. Last December, the group had called for an average 8% gain for 2007, and the S&P 500 had rallied 9.5% to a record 1553 mid-July. But after falling quickly to 1371 by mid-August, it is up just 3.9% for the year.


Richard Bernstein
Merrill Lynch
S&P 500
Year End:1530
12 Months: 1560
10-yr Treasury Yield: 4.25%
Fed-Funds Rate: 4.5%
S&P 500 Op Profits '07E: $93
'08E: $92

Favored Sectors: Health care, consumer staples, telecom, industrialIn the latest survey, performed in mid- and late-August, one of the most bullish strategists was François Trahan, chief investment strategist at the broker-dealer and investment advisory firm ISI Group. He thinks the economy is in the throes of a mid-cycle slowdown brought on by 17 interest-rate hikes -- but he doesn't see the economy weakening enough to trigger any immediate rate cuts.

"People also equate the credit crunch with a liquidity crunch, and that's wrong," Trahan says. Among other things, cash on corporate balance sheets is high, at nearly 15% of the stock market's total valuation, and the influx of petro-dollars and global money-supply growth all make for abundant liquidity. Trahan stands by his year-end S&P 500 target of 1700, which he set this spring, and he favors cyclical sectors like materials, industrials and technology. He shuns rate-sensitive financial stocks and counter-cyclical sectors like utilities and consumer staples.


David Bianco
UBS
S&P 500
Year End: 1600
12 Months: 1650
10-yr Treasury Yield: 4.5%
Fed-Funds Rate: 4.75%
S&P 500 Op Profits '07E: $95
'08E: $101

Favored Sectors: Industrial, energy, technological, financialsAUGUST'S JITTERY STOCK slide also was seen as a contrarian Buy signal. "Investors are very nervous right now, and embedded risk premium is higher than warranted," says Goldman Sachs' Abby Joseph Cohen. "The stock market is undervalued relative to its fundamentals." In addition, corporations' balance sheets are in "excellent shape," with enough liquidity to finance new jobs, strategic acquisitions and business expansion.

Downside stock risk is further limited by stocks' moderate valuation, the strategists say. The S&P 500 is trading at 15.9 times its operating earnings over the past four quarters -- within the valuation "bull's eye" of between 14 and 16 times, notes Citigroup's Tobias Levkovich. Since 1940, a price-to-earnings in that range has produced strong returns averaging 17% in the next 12 months.


Abby Joseph Cohen
Goldman Sachs
S&P 500
Year End: 1600
12 Months: 1680
10-yr Treasury Yield: 4.75%
Fed-Funds Rate: 4.5%
S&P 500 Op Profits '07E: $93
'08E: $100

Favored Sectors: Energy, info tech, industrialRobert Parker, a London-based senior member of Credit Suisse's global investment committee, sees U.S. economic growth slowing to about 2% in the second half. But large U.S. companies' exposure to robust European and Asian growth, along with a weak dollar, will stave off a U.S. recession. As the debt market backs off, the "mountains of LBO cash that had been raised will increasingly be used to take large minority positions" in public companies, with private equity looking to boost returns through operational restructuring or management change -- as opposed to financial leverage.

Will defaults spread quickly from subprime through the credit spectrum? How will stricter lending affect Americans' relentless spending? Will companies keep hiring if consumer spending slows? As long as questions like these persist, Larry Adam, Deutsche Bank Alex. Brown's chief investment strategist, will favor stocks hitched to business spending over those dependent on consumers. He is also steering toward companies with foreign sales, strong pricing power and reduced sensitivity to interest-rate movement.


Tobias Levkovich
Citigroup
S&P 500
Year End: 1600
12 Months: 1725
10-yr Treasury Yield: 4.90%
Fed-Funds Rate: 4.5%
S&P 500 Op Profits '07E: $94.75
'08E: $101.75

Favored Sectors: Info tech, energyMerrill's Bernstein has a short list of five investment themes. He believes, for instance, that better value can now be found in developed markets than in emerging ones, which have attracted hordes of investors that have fully priced in the growth potential. Risk-averse investors also should be guided by dividends and cash holdings, he says. Other areas to focus on in this volatile market include high-quality bonds, large-cap stocks and defensive sectors.

In fact, large-cap stocks and foreign sales exposure have become such recurring themes one might question the wisdom of such popular ideas.

"Yes, some of these trades may be crowded," says Goldman's Cohen of the preference for large-cap stocks and global exposure. "But it's still worthwhile if its price-to-earnings or price-to-book valuations are still attractive. The consensus is not always wrong."


Tom McManus
BofA Securities

S&P 500
Year End: 1465
12 Months: 1590
10-yr Treasury Yield: 5.10%
Fed-Funds Rate: 5.0%
S&P 500 Op Profits '07E: $93
'08E: $102

Favored Sectors: Consumer staples, health careIN CONTRAST, A DISTINCTLY uncrowded sector where strategists have feared to tread is financials, given the worsening fallout from the debt market. But it is precisely this aversion that leads David Bianco, UBS Securities' chief U.S. equity strategist, to nudge financials onto his roster of favored sectors (albeit behind industrials, energy and technology).

"Financial stocks have been priced for disaster," he says. Another catalyst: a belief that the Fed might soon cut rates to 4.75%, and financial stocks' historical outperformance as rates fall. Bianco likes big-bank stocks including Bank of America (ticker: BAC), in part for its 5% dividend yield, and capital-markets stalwarts like State Street (STT).


Robert Parker
Credit Suisse
S&P 500
Year End: 1500
12 Months: 1575
10-yr Treasury Yield: 5.20%
Fed-Funds Rate: 5.25%
S&P 500 Op Profits '07E: $102.60
'08E: $112

Favored Sectors: Technology, health care, telecom, mediaMeanwhile, the energy sector has shone in recent years and remains a proxy for global growth. Valuations remain modest, and cash-rich balance sheets help inoculate against constricting credit. "With powerful cash flow, the energy sector is not likely to be burdened with debt," notes Citigroup's Levkovich, who favors integrated oil and gas companies.

Tech attracts strategists for various reasons. Credit Suisse's Parker, for one, sees increased capital spending on technology infrastructure, especially on "tech nuts and bolts" companies like the network equipment bellwether Cisco Systems (CSCO). Merrill's Bernstein sees large tech stocks increasingly as stable defensive bets.

"A handful of large tech stocks have dividend yields better than the market," he says. In addition, some have lower betas, or are less volatile, than the market, and "sentiment toward tech has been so negative for so long."


François Trahan
ISI Group
S&P 500
Year End: 1700
12 Months: N.A.
10-yr Treasury Yield: 5.0%
Fed-Funds Rate: 5.25%
S&P 500 Op Profits '07E: $95
'08E: $103

Favored Sectors: Materials, industrials, technologyWhat keeps the strategists up at night? Wall Street expects the pillar that is the job market to hold up, even as financial-services firms cut more than 25,000 positions in August. So any signs of job weakness -- the unemployment rate climbing to 5%, or two consecutive months with job additions falling below 100,000 -- will cause consternation.

With S&P 500 profits increasingly supported by exports, the threat of protectionism -- and retaliation by trading partners like China -- also looms as a worry.

Monetary risk lurks, too. "If the Fed were to cut rates at a time when the European Central Bank is tightening, the dollar will just melt down -- and that's not a good scenario," Trahan says.

Measures of inflation have largely behaved since peaking a year ago, but BofA's McManus cautions against writing off inflation risk. "Most people expect a slight rise in unemployment to help quash inflationary pressure, but that's in an environment of commodity deflation," he says -- not today's backdrop of surging global prices.

Not surprisingly, all eyes are on commodity prices. "Firm commodity prices are a good indication of healthy global growth," UBS's Bianco says. After all, the strategists are counting on global growth to stay strong enough to prop up the U.S. economy, but not so strong that inflation is imported. It's a fine line, with little margin for error.



To: carranza2 who wrote (21862)9/1/2007 5:53:38 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217749
 
First of many online.barrons.com

Why Sentinel Collapsed
By JONATHAN R. LAING

SENTINEL MANAGEMENT GROUP, the quasi-money-market-fund company, played to the hilt the drama of the current liquidity crisis on Aug. 13, when it suspended redemptions by clients. "Fear has overtaken reason," Sentinel groused in a statement. "...High-grade securities are trading like junk bonds as panicked investors dump names like General Electric at Tyco-like prices." Therefore, the company said, it felt compelled to freeze customer accounts, rather than take any losses on the $1.2 billion it held for investors.

But the story line quickly unraveled after investigators from the Securities and Exchange Commission and the National Futures Association, an industry self-regulatory body, descended on Sentinel's Northbrook, Ill., office over the following four days. According to people with knowledge of the matter, the SEC and NFA found Sentinel's records a mess. Regulators couldn't seem to get a straight answer to their most basic questions. The job became all the more difficult when Sentinel summarily fired its chief trader and portfolio manager, Charles Mosley, later that week for alleged "misconduct" and then filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy.

A WEEK LATER, ON AUG. 20, the SEC filed a civil action against Sentinel in Federal District Court in Chicago, charging it with fraud, misappropriation and misuse of client money. The agency asserted that Sentinel's daily accounts were "misleading" and that some $600 million of customer money was missing. Moreover, according to the SEC complaint, "at least $460 million" in customer securities had been transferred to a "house account," many of them serving improperly as collateral for loans extended to Sentinel Management Group.

Thus, the SEC dolefully concluded, using the credit crunch to justify the freeze was "false and misleading." It was tantamount to setting a fire to mask a burglary.

Heavy client losses are expected. The returns are already in on Sentinel's so-called Seg-1 bank account, which purportedly had more than $500 million of unencumbered assets and which recently was liquidated. Alaron Trading, a commodity broker with some $70 million in cash in Seg-1, reportedly got nearly 100 cents on the dollar back. But customers who didn't act as quickly are likely to recoup only 75% to 80%. That's because Sentinel was permitted by the NFA to conduct a fire sale of Seg-1's remaining assets in which the opportunistic Chicago hedge fund Citadel Investment Group bought some $400 million of highly liquid assets for $312 million. With no competition, Citadel made a low-ball bid and then extracted a $45 million haircut on its purchase price, as a "market-conditions concession."


Where are the hundreds of millions of missing dollars? Regulators and Sentinel's recently appointed bankruptcy trustee are trying to find them.
Another reason for the paltry returns from the Seg-1 liquidation is that Sentinel failed to deliver to Citadel around $60 million of the promised securities in the original deal. Says the NFA's chief operating officer, Dan Driscoll: "This shortfall surprised us, but we were in a hurry to get the account liquidated. Otherwise, a dozen or so commodity brokers with excess customer margin money at Sentinel would likely have gone under."

But the real blood will be spilled by the hedge funds, commodity traders and wealthy individuals who had about $800 million in Sentinel's Seg-III account. This account, regulators say, was looted to boost Sentinel's house account. The money was pledged as collateral for loans to Sentinel. Driscoll says that Seg-III holders will be lucky to get even half their money. As of two weeks ago, investigators had found only $92 million of the $800 million.

Where are the missing funds? That's what regulators and Sentinel's recently appointed bankruptcy trustee are trying to determine. Sentinel's 42-year-old CEO, Eric Bloom, citing his lawyer's advice, wouldn't discuss the case with a Barron's reporter who went to his home.

Sentinel attracted money by offering tantalizing returns. Its Seg-1 account, for example, regularly was reported to be delivering monthly returns as much as a half-percentage-point above the 90-day Treasury bill's yield. And Seg-3's "prime" program clients were supposedly enjoying 1-to-1.2-percentage-point spreads. "Customers were drawn to Sentinel by these results like proverbial moths to the flame," says Diane Mix, president of the Chicago money manager Horizon Cash Management.

TO BOOST THE NUMBERS, however, Sentinel used tons of leverage and longer-dated -- and riskier -- maturities. In the prime program, for instance, the average maturity had ballooned to some 33 years by June, according to company reports. Sentinel, unbeknownst to clients, also frequently used its portfolios as collateral in the "repo" market, to earn a rate higher than what it paid out to clients, and even bought racier, higher-yielding bonds. Thus, even though it said clients could redeem 100% of their money on any business day, as they could at a money-market fund, Sentinel wasn't in a position to handle a run on the bank like the one the subprime debacle set off.

An analyst at a firm hired by several Sentinel clients to sort through the mess believes that, by this spring, desperation reigned inside Sentinel. "Look at these account statements between May and the end of the line, the Aug. 13 freeze," this person says, brandishing a sheaf of papers.

In May, the $400 million in prime portfolios had held securities of high-quality corporate names like GE and Toyota, along with longer-dated bonds backed by capital securities of major banks and insurers. Sure the average maturity of the holdings, as mentioned, had bulged out to beyond 30 years. But the securities were largely of the floating-rate variety, subject to interest-rate resets every quarter. Thus, the portfolios were somewhat protected against price loss from a rise in long-term rates.

But fast-forward to the Aug. 13 statements that were Exhibit A in the SEC's recent filings. The quality names had disappeared from customer statements, replaced by single-A and triple-B tranches of collateral debt and loan obligations in obscure entities like Taberna Funding, a pool of capital securities of obscure real-estate investment trusts, real-estate developers and home builders originated by Cohen Brothers Financial. And nearly half of the portfolios were in private placements so arcane that even after two days of forensic digging, the clients' analyst had yet to uncover any information on them.

Sentinel was desperately grasping for yield. But most of the names that produced it would be difficult to sell under the best of circumstances. They were impossible to liquidate in today's seized-up credit markets. Horrible collateral performance in the Taberna securitizations has rendered Sentinel's lower-ranked tranches virtually worthless.

"Clearly, Sentinel was trying for a Hail Mary play in Prime to boost income yield and perhaps make up for past losses by buying absolute garbage," concludes the analyst. "Unfortunately, as happens so often when a gambler doubles down, losses just escalate."

A difficult fate likewise impends for French hedge-fund operator Capital Fund Management, which has disclosed a $400 million exposure to Sentinel. Over the past three years, it had placed the money in a program calling for conservative investments and in an account separate from other clients'. Yet Sentinel froze their account, too. "Post the bankruptcy, we will be exhausting every legal avenue to recoup those securities," insists Chicago lawyer Arthur Hahn of Katten Muchin Rosenman, who is representing CFM.

But a sizable recovery may be difficult. CFM's securities appear to have been pledged by Sentinel to Bank of New York in return for a $321 million loan. And now that Sentinel has defaulted on the loan, Bank of New York plans to recover its money by selling the collateral.

The Sentinel story is a scabrous tale in which nobody looks good. The firm's customers let greed cloud sound judgment. The NFA obviously bungled its audits of Sentinel as much as it blew the recent liquidation of the Seg-1 account. And what positive is there to say about Sentinel boss Eric Bloom and his colleagues?

Sentinel has provided an expensive lesson in that old bromide: If something looks too good to be true, it usually is.