Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: d[-_-]b who wrote (349548)	9/3/2007 12:04:46 AM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573827

"I agree and locating those Hydrogen generating plants near the Yucca mountain storage project would be wise in my opinion. " There is the hydrogen storage problem to be solved. The nuclear industry has been emphasizing high burnup reactors. This greatly reduces the nuclear waste. en.wikipedia.org

To: d[-_-]b who wrote (349548)	9/3/2007 9:03:44 AM
From: steve harris	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573827

Yuma is a great idea. We already got nukes in Arkansas, why not a few more? Have the consumer price based upon how far you are from the nuclear plant. An incentive to have a nuke in your neighborhood. The source of water is easy. The oceans are to rise and flood the coasts according to algore, what better way to save the coastlines? I thought I read somewhere that if all of the current corn acreage was used for fuel, it would only be about 10% of our needs. I think there is a capacity problem that cannot be overcome. Searching google, there are already hydrogen pipelines, so that technology is already there for distribution. Now to convince everyone that hydrogen is much safer than gasoline... rmi.org