SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : THE WHITE HOUSE -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Gersh Avery who wrote (8210)9/3/2007 11:05:48 AM
From: GROUND ZERO™  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25737
 
You're the one who said "moslums at random," not I... now you suggest moslum extremists... now, that is certainly different than moslums at random, as you amazingly suggested at first... huge difference there, wouldn't you agree?

Who would get to draw the line?

That's easy enough, anyone who takes up arms against the United States qualifies, moslum or not... again, you keep bringing moslum into this...

are you serious? I didn't know that there were non-moslum jihadists. Could you site an example please?

Are you kidding? Timothy McVeigh, and any of those other nut jobs who take up arms against the United States, but certainly most of them are moslum...

Your very questions themselves clearly demonstrate the weakness in your reasoning here, you fail to see the whole picture... I'm not talking about moslums or any one group, but you keep bringing them into the picture... I'm talking about anyone who qualifies, they don't have to be moslum, jihadism is an equal opportunity fanaticism...<g>

GZ