Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (349589)	9/5/2007 2:14:15 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575941

The stuff you presented doesn't make the case you want it to make. It doesn't support your conclusion. --- On a related note - "No doubt. Case in point is a recent study reported in the newspaper that shows that the majority of new jobs in California pay in the upper two earning quintiles. If you don't want to click on the PDF to see the numbers, the bar graph is titled "Share of California’s job growth by earnings quintiles, 1979-2005" and the numbers from lowest earning quintile to highest are 26.9%, 6%, 14%, 25%, and 28.1%. Here are some possible headlines: "Majority of new jobs at upper end of earnings spectrum" "Growth in higher earning jobs double that of lower earning jobs" "Only 6.9% of workers earning less" "Most doing better; some left behind" "Middle-wage jobs declining in California as disparity grows" After what I am sure was a considered and intelligent debate in the editorial room, or more likely exactly the opposite, which do you think they went with?" reason.com