Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: energyplay who wrote (22048)	9/7/2007 1:38:39 AM
From: TobagoJack	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 220051

<<There's still a little debate over deflation vs. inflation first>> ... it is settled, in my mind, first inflation, then deflation, and then inflation again, only to be followed yet once more by ... <<Sub prime makes a lot of money go away>> ... all the cure-all monetary voodoo in response will created some offset to all the blown up loans backed by more blown up loans-supported assets <<We may get price increases without asset price increases>> ... the worst of all possible worlds, bar one, where everything we need goes up in price, and everything we have goes the opposite direction. ... how thrilling.

To: energyplay who wrote (22048)	9/7/2007 3:39:04 AM
From: elmatador	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 220051

Present shake up becoming clear now. Officially, the money made available for the banks is just to keep up with the depositors to withdraw without crashing the economy. 1) if the deposits are guaranteed by FDIC then, why depositors are withdrawing? OR 2) are the deposits much higher than the FDIC insured? Why not, then, insure higher amounts thus making sure that the depositors are not going to withdraw since they feel they are safe? Insured deposits by the FDIC must be increased by the same reason TJ’s gold is up: Because the USD value went down: it was USD.85/Euro now is USD1.36 /Euro