Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Petz who wrote (240017)	9/8/2007 2:51:26 AM
From: graphicsguru	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

No, not fud. How much do you think the numbers changed? I bet not much. AMD simply didn't want him to publish early, so they made a big deal about a small last-minute improvement. What's your theory? How far off do you think Ou is?

To: Petz who wrote (240017)	9/8/2007 11:22:13 AM
From: dougSF30	Respond to of 275872

AMD says a lot of things. As gg asks you, how different do you think the "true" numbers are? I'd guess that even "no difference" is a strong possibility.

To: Petz who wrote (240017)	9/8/2007 11:46:47 AM
From: dougSF30	Respond to of 275872

Ou updates... adds Intel September numbers. Reveals that AMD numbers are from August 20th and 28th submissions AMD made to SPEC! So much for FUD. The only FUD is coming from AMD PR. Intel's 2P SPECint_rate scores have improved. blogs.zdnet.com blogs.zdnet.com And 4P blogs.zdnet.com As suspected, the only thing Barc is good at... SPECfp_rate: blogs.zdnet.com In November, the Seaburg platform will boost Intel's 2P SPEC_rate scores for both Clovertown and 45nm Harpertown, extending the int_rate advantage and narrowing the fp_rate disadvantage.