SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Snowshoe who wrote (22171)9/9/2007 2:13:22 PM
From: Slagle  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 217818
 
Snowshoe,
I suppose I didn't state that very well. There were some problems, that I know, like those you mention.

BUT. if you read critiques of the Y2K activities of the Greenspan fed, both then and after the fact, seems to me that some very smart people have pegged it right on the money, so to speak.

Greenie used the "crisis" to pump vast amounts of unneeded liquidity into the system right at a critical point in the cycle, when it would have the most effect on stock prices. In any event that is what happened.

It was a transfer of wealth from the many to the few and it is not over even yet.

The unnecessary (but intentional) stock market bubble and collapse brought on a recession which in turn begat the "housing bubble", which is now in the process of collapse.

Which will again cause a transfer of wealth from the many to the few, as it runs its course.
Slagle




To: Snowshoe who wrote (22171)9/9/2007 2:25:04 PM
From: critical_mass  Respond to of 217818
 
On top of that, Y2K provided an excuse to move mainframe based legacy systems to a more cost effective n-tier or web based architectures.