SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (765115)9/10/2007 8:18:22 PM
From: pompsander  Respond to of 769670
 
Some nice powerpoint...

__________________-

Another Petraeus graph: showing again that the "surge," the Anbar tribe turn-around and the decision of Shiite militias to hold back while Maliki consolidates Shiite power have reduced the energy of the insurgency to levels of ... eighteen months ago. I don't see this as an end to the civil war, just an abatement. If you were worried about the insurgency in 2004, three years later, it is far, far stronger - and the political center has collapsed entirely. The tactical gains of the surge seem to have prevented a slide into an abyss - but not much more can be said at this point. And the announced aim of the surge - political reconciliation - has failed.

andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com



To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (765115)9/10/2007 9:51:24 PM
From: GROUND ZERO™  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 769670
 
Actually I would, but I know there is no liberal in this world who would have taken the fight to the enemy... obama said he would invade Pakistan to find obl, but isn't obama the same guy who said that he voted against the war and never send troops into another country?

There are many things I would do differently than Bush, but I would vote for him again over kerry if I had to do it over again...

GZ