SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ahhaha who wrote (88741)9/11/2007 12:52:28 AM
From: Sr KRespond to of 306849
 
This was about short-term money.

I was responding to Grace's "there is no free market for money"

and

"are you trying to argue that there is a free market for short term money because we all trade government securities freely?"

I stand by my implication that active markets with many participants, and after-auction liquidity, such as 91-day T-bills, price more fairly with less disparity between price and value than illiquid markets with fewer participants.

"Rates [are] freely set" not by buyers or sellers, but by both, and the more the better, and so I challenged the assertion that "trading them freely" would be sufficient to fairly price a T-bill or a T-Note (or any other security). That's information provided by the after-auction markets. Without those sellers, "we'd" be flying blind, to use your analogy.

The point of using T-bills (rather than 5.10% bank CD's) is preservation of capital while waiting for other opportunities or as margin for hedging or shorting or other opportunities. I was wondering if Grace or others on this board think T-bills are not risk-free or priced accurately.

At another extreme in the debt markets, some tax-frees almost can't be traded after they are issued. You buy a whole issue or a piece of it, and expect to hold it to maturity.

If a buyer and a seller want to know the price they pay or receive is fair and the corresponding yield is a market rate, the narrower the spread, the closer it will be. That will only happen, first, if there is a bid and asked price, and generally, if there are many participants. Or if you set the price without knowing if you are a buyer or seller.

If you think the treasury "Markets don't have ANYTHING to do with value", I think you're the proverbial fool.

Or you thought we were talking about equities.

Or both.