SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : THE WHITE HOUSE -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (8613)9/11/2007 6:42:49 AM
From: John Carragher  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25737
 
i saw the repeat on fox later after the posting. Ron Paul and others are frustrating how they distorts truths. he says we are the invaders and cause the Al Q. attacks. He omits the embassy bombings during the Clinton administrations,etc.

He says we didn't go after Al Q. leader,, he forgets how successful the attack in Afghanistan was and how quickly it turned around vs nytimes and other negative articles just weeks prior. he forgets it was not our country and we were not trying to take over Afghanistan but get their leadership on our side. hence we worked with them, with our major troops still being half way around the world. He forgets that Pakistan is a nuclear nation and that perhaps half the army supports Al Q. , He forgets to mention that the united nations supported going after saddam, a wmd threat. He forgets to blame countries like France that told Saddam we would not invade the country, or Russia or the money being paid off to so many in united nations under oil for food program to look the other way and that Saddam kept up the pretense of having wmd.

I noticed he doesn't listen when O"R is talking, his eyes are moving rapidly and i believe he is looking to pull out more speaking points vs address the questions or discuss any subjects other than his talking points.



To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (8613)9/11/2007 9:58:09 AM
From: longnshort  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25737
 
I agree, I saw it. He's a boring old man. he avoided O'rielly's questions, but O'rielly could have done a better job