Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Epic American Credit and Bond Bubble Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: yard_man who wrote (86210)	9/13/2007 10:03:42 AM
From: zamboz	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 110194

I see your point. But getting rid of the "fat fingers" is worth a new label. Much of nanotech involves mechanical manipulation of molecules. Nanobots should not be called chemistry. When everything we use gets redesigned to take advantage of this new molecular level technology, that is huge. I agree that it will take time, but it will be irrepressible.

To: yard_man who wrote (86210)	9/13/2007 10:11:37 AM
From: 10K a day	Respond to of 110194

> there are lots of things you can do with a few molecules in the laboratory -- that CAN NEVER be a cost-effective basis for manufacture of a product.<< Yah it's like burning salt water in a lab w/ radio waves. If you start burning everyone's myocardium they aren't going to be too happy. And if all the meth [purifying] scientists end up on ventilators from destroying lung tissue. they aren't going to be too happy either...Not real practical stuff in the real world. jmo.