Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: steve harris who wrote (350781)	9/16/2007 8:27:00 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572838

"Let me know if there is a point you would fight to defend America instead of surrendering." You are a funny man. The world isn't a schoolyard. If you have read Sun Tzu, then you should know that wars are a last resort. And when you do go to war, make sure you achieve your goals instead of getting into a sliding mission... Fighting WWIII in 1951 would not have been defending America. It would have been stupid. The opportunity to take the USSR came during the final days of WWII when Patton wanted to go to Moscow. It likely would have been a debacle, but there was at least a chance to do it without killing a large fraction of the people in the Northern Hemisphere.