Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bentway who wrote (242037)	9/17/2007 12:36:32 PM
From: michael97123	Respond to of 281500

"Everything said now about Iran was said about Pakistan." and your point is?? Actually i am more afraid of pakistan and the potential for al queda there than iran. If both have it i am doubly afraid. The regime in iran is primitive, and terroristic in its behaviour. They cannot be allowed to develop nukes. They may never use them on israel but they will use them to intimidate our allies in the middle east like saudi arabia, egypt, jordan etc. Do you want them to go nuclear too? Your logic is flawed because its based on israel and not on western interests in the middle east--oil and otherwise. Israel is protecting its neigbors from initimidation as strange as that may sound. And that fact has not gone unnoticed in moderate arab states or by the optometrist and his patron iran. I give the optometrist no more than one year in power before the sunni majority overthrow him and take power in syria much like the shiaa did in iraq.