Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: c.hinton who wrote (242058)	9/17/2007 1:44:36 PM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

CH, for decades and centuries, I have been paying a lot of tax in the USA. Those are MY nukes: <its nice that you are so free with the nukes of others you little free loader.g> I have been paying tax and not even getting a vote. King George got a revolution - "No taxation without representation". You'd think I wouldn't have to pay tax in the USA, but I do. They least I should get for my money is a few nukes. King George II has taken over where King George III left off a couple of hundred years ago. Mqurice

To: c.hinton who wrote (242058)	9/17/2007 1:49:07 PM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Hey CH, you are a freeloader too. Under the american nuclear umbrella gives the intellectual knee jerk anti americans cover. Please dont get like noel leon. You have yet to address any of my key questions. Are you really willing to let me classify you as an appeaser? You know deep down iran with nukes under this regime and the ayotollahs is unacceptable. Why do you worry so. Italian troops rarely participate in war in any major way. The future of this battle against islamic extremism of both varieties will be fought by the US, GB, France with the limited help from Eastern Europe. No one is going to ask you to miss a meal in Tuscany or a siesta. All we ask is for your suppport and recognition who are the good guys and who are the bad ones.

To: c.hinton who wrote (242058)	9/17/2007 1:53:23 PM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

He didnt say air war. He said nuke em. That always works CH. He was being ironic and you and sarman continue to take MQ literally. Nuking him is not what he wants. What he is saying is that without you supporting any policy with credibility to stop iran from developing nukes, you are hastening the day they might be destroyed. Dont you get it yet? Containment/deterrence stops nuke war. It involves conventional forces. It involves clear lines of demcarcation on both sides. Appeasemment will eventually fail and the only thing left to the west at that time will be total nuke war.