Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Road Walker who wrote (350852)	9/17/2007 4:21:43 PM
From: longnshort	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1577032

He's a swell hero to have, you must be proud of yourself

To: Road Walker who wrote (350852)	9/17/2007 5:28:11 PM
From: longnshort	Respond to of 1577032

A ‘realistic chance’ of success By Charles Krauthammer Printer Friendly Version Email this article jewishworldreview.com \| As always, the inadvertent slip is the most telling. Discussing the performance of British troops, Gen. David Petraeus told Sen. Joe Biden of the Foreign Relations Committee that he'd be consulting with British colleagues in London on his way back "home." He had meant to say "Iraq," where he is now on his third tour of duty. Is there any other actor in Washington's Iraq War drama — from Harry Reid to the Joint Chiefs — who could have made such a substitution? Anyone who not only knows Iraq the way Petraeus does, but feels it in all its gravity and complexity? When asked about Shiite militia domination of southern Iraq, Petraeus patiently went through the four provinces, one by one, displaying a degree of knowledge of the local players, terrain and balance of power that no one in Washington — and few in Iraq — could match. When Biden thought he had a gotcha — contradictions between Petraeus' report on Iraqi violence and the less favorable one by the Government Accountability Office — Petraeus calmly pointed out that the GAO had to cut its data-gathering five weeks short to meet reporting requirements to Congress. And since those most recent five weeks had been particularly productive for the coalition, the GAO numbers were not only outdated but misleading. For all the attempts by Democrats and the anti-war movement to discredit Petraeus, he won the congressional confrontation hands down. He demonstrated enough military progress from his new counterinsurgency strategy to conclude: "I believe we have a realistic chance of achieving our objectives in Iraq." The American people are not anti-war. They are anti-losing. Which means they are also anti-drift. Adrift is where we were during most of 2006 — the annus horribilis initiated by Abu Musab al-Zarqawi's bringing down the Golden Mosque in Samarra — until the new counterinsurgency strategy of 2007 (the "surge") reversed the trajectory of the war. It was being lost both in Iraq and at home. On the home front, Petraeus deftly deflated the rush to withdrawal that appeared poised to acquire irresistible momentum this summer. First, by demonstrating real and irrefutable territorial gains on the ground. And second, by proposing minor immediate withdrawals to be followed by fully liquidating the "surge" by next summer. Those withdrawals should be enough to hold the wobbly Republican senators. And perhaps even more important, the Pentagon brass. The service chiefs no longer fight wars. That's now left to theater commanders such as Petraeus. The chiefs' job is to raise armies — to recruit, train, equip and manage. Petraeus' job is to use their armies to win wars. The chiefs are quite reasonably concerned about the enormous strain put on their worldwide forces by the tempo of operations in Iraq. Petraeus' withdrawal recommendations have prevented a revolt of the generals. Petraeus' achievement is no sleight of hand. If he had not produced real demonstrable progress on the ground — reported by many independent observers, including liberal Democrats, even before he came back home (i.e., the U.S.) — his appearance before Congress would have swayed no one. His testimony, steady and forthright, bought him the time to achieve his "realistic chance" of success. Not the unified democratic Iraq we had hoped for the day Saddam's statue came down, but a radically decentralized Iraq with enough regional autonomy and self-sufficiency to produce a tolerable stalemated coexistence between contending forces. That's for the longer term and still quite problematic. In the shorter term, however, there is a realistic chance of achieving a separate success that, within the context of Iraq, is of a second order but in the global context is of the highest order — the defeat of al-Qaida in Iraq. Having poisoned one country and been expelled from it (Afghanistan), al-Qaida seized upon post-Saddam instability to establish itself in the very heart of the Arab Middle East — Sunni Iraq. Yet now, in front of all the world, Iraq's Sunnis are, to use the biblical phrase, vomiting out al-Qaida. This is a defeat and humiliation in the extreme — an Arab Muslim population rejecting al-Qaida so violently that it allies itself in battle with the infidel, the foreigner, the occupier. Just carrying this battle to its successful conclusion — independent of its larger effect of helping stabilize Iraq — is justification enough for the surge. The turning of Sunni Iraq against al-Qaida is a signal event in the war on terror. Petraeus' plan is to be allowed to see it through. jewishworldreview.com

To: Road Walker who wrote (350852)	9/17/2007 5:56:13 PM
From: longnshort	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1577032

Greek conservatives win By Andrew Borowiec September 17, 2007 Greek Prime Minister Costas Karamanlis, with his wife, Natassa, waved yesterday to the supporters of the New Democracy Party. Mr. Karamanlis recognized a "clear mandate ... to continue changes and reforms" after the socialists conceded defeat. NICOSIA, Cyprus — Conservative Prime Minister Costas Karamanlis won a second term in Greece's parliamentary elections yesterday, but his party will have a slimmer majority in parliament. Mr. Karamanlis declared victory after his main opponent Panhellenic Socialist Movement (PASOK) party leader George Papandreou, conceded defeat. "You have given a clear mandate to New Democracy to continue the changes and reforms which the country needs," Mr. Karamanlis said, referring to his party, in a televised address to the nation. "I will do my utmost to honor your confidence as prime minister of all Greeks." The election results indicated New Democracy would win enough seats in the 300-member parliament to form a governing majority after the elections. With 94 percent of the votes counted, New Democracy party was ahead with 42.2 percent, while PASOK had 38.2 percent. New Democracy was likely to win 153 of the 300 seats in parliament, compared to 165 in the outgoing legislature, the results showed. PASOK looked set to win just 103 seats in parliament — the lowest number it has held since 1977. Mr. Karamanlis, whose party was dogged by its poor response to the wildfires that killed 65 persons and ravaged whole villages last month, had warned that if his party failed to win a decisive majority, he would call new elections. Mr. Papandreou, in a final attempt to capitalize on the fires, had pledged to name an environment-conscious Cabinet. Page 1 of 2 next \| Email \| Print \| Subscribe Click-2-Listen Listen to this article or download audio file. Click-2-Listen Listen to this article or download audio file. Front Page > Nation/Politics advertisement