SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (242255)9/18/2007 8:11:15 PM
From: michael97123  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
It seems to me that both wharf mouse and chinton both admitted that they support a policy of appeasement vis a vis iran. That blows me away but at least they are honest. They hate bush so much and transfer that hate into distrust of everything the US does. Thus iran aint so bad and aint no threat and whose kids are going to die and who is going to pay the bill etc.
This is an argument that they have used against me today as i propose no war but containment of iran in arabia and deterrence against iran on nuke development.
Its like these guys would have surrendered to the Kman from USSR when he banged his shoes on the table at the UN or when he sent missiles to Cuber.. And wharf mouse is an old fart so he should know better. OTOH, Chinton has been eurobabbled so much that he doesnt know which way is up much less what munich was about.



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (242255)9/19/2007 12:58:51 AM
From: c.hinton  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
Nadine look at defence spending for that period....i did post it.

you say england could have gone to war with czechs as allies ,great!

just how do they get there and where is the air support and the navy is useless on dry land.

the population ,in the midst of a depression and with all to vivid memories of trench warfare ,would have not supported an invasion.

nadine you are grasping at straws .