Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: michael97123 who wrote (242303)	9/19/2007 9:34:44 AM
From: c.hinton	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

Michael i am just pointing out how wrong many people are about "munich"especially when they use it as an excuse to attack pre emptively. You blithly talk about it all as if there would be no ill consequences ..... bombing iran is hardly the end of it all...yet you talk as if it were. I hope bush plans ahead better than you.... who modifies his position with every post. ps "re .What i said is that munich is symbolic of the wests failing for the 10 years prior to munich." i am still waiting for that link to the statement YOU CLAIM TO HAVE MADE. hey! i like your derogatory term "euro history" some of you guys are really amusing!

To: michael97123 who wrote (242303)	9/19/2007 9:37:27 AM
From: SARMAN	Respond to of 281500

First of all who the hell are you to dictate what goes on in the ME. Second you want to play fair, you force Israel to disarm their nukes. You can not dictate to someone not to have nukes yet you allow someone else. Answer this micheal, did the United State sign the NP treaty? Did Israel, Pakistan and India sign the same treaty? Now ask yourself this, did Iran sign the treaty. You see micheal hypocrisy that pisses Iran and the rest the world off. Micheal just come out and admit that all the war talk is to appease Israel, why hide behind Nadine's dress.